I don’t think this type of behaviour is okay, but if she had been a boy grabbing a girl then I bet everybody’s reactions would’ve been different.
I don’t think this type of behaviour is okay, but if she had been a boy grabbing a girl then I bet everybody’s reactions would’ve been different.
I approve of all of this, but especially the last part.
... Muslims call him and tell him he’s right?
This should have more stars.
Thank you! I’m glad I’m not the only one who gets a little annoyed by this.
Imagine all the future money and above all pain for victims that could be saved if these kinds of crimes were properly investigated the first time they were committed...
In Sweden we recently changed our paper-bills, to portray for example Astrid Lindgren (the author of Pippi Longstocking, and Mio amongst other works) and director Ingmar Bergman. Money doesn’t have to just be political leaders :P
I approve.
They may have thought she was going to ask for too much money, given her current popularity etc.
I agree, I also felt it was a big disservice to the character that we don’t get to see the third child born. It was Sookie for fuck’s sake! We deserved to get some closure on her too, and as it was, her character ended as still a little mad at her husband for lying. I’m curious to see how they will account for her…
His daughters must feel so wanted and loved.
I’m guessing he’s thinking that a rapekit would reveal that A penetrated B, but if it’s consensual then there’s no need for technical evidence of that. A admitted to penetrating B, so that part isn’t contested. To follow your analogy, you don’t need to check fingerprints if the perp comes back when called and says…
If she did anything herself, or helped cover it up, then I don’t think it would protected under spousal testimonial privilege. That only helps if her spouse told her that he did something, not things she did. (Although I may remember this completely wrong)
... he understands, right, that America is a republic?
I’m neither American nor Japanese, so I don’t know: Why are you even there?
No, you’re not the only one who read it that way, that is definitely a possible interpretation. I’m curious to see what the company response is though.
What kind of lawyer does he have that didn’t foresee this? I’m seriously curious about the line of thinking there.
In Sweden there is a warning before his show about some of his methods being illegal here, which really tells me everything I need to know about him and his methods.
I agree, she’s the only reason I kept watching this series (I was otherwise turned off it by seeing Travolta’s eyebrows)
was your teacher named Snape by any chance?