Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    ianferno
    Ian
    ianferno

    Eh, no, pretty sure I’m (sarcastically) right here...

    She also said she wants it 50% women, which might not be possible, JUST AS 50% men might not be, either. It could be that 100% of the positions are filled with women, which would be great. Also, I don’t give a flying fuck who fills the positions. I just want *people* who know what they’re doing.

    Cory Booker is great. Great dude. But I’d rather Liz Warren go first.

    WE AGREE WITH YOU!! THERE ARE PLENTY OF UNDERQUALIFIED MEN!! Good god...we agree on that. But that is not the rule, it’s the exception, and it sucks. Guess what? Want a really hot take? There are a lot of underqualified women too! :D

    You know, you could try fucking off for once. Is it so bad to simply want the most qualified PERSON for every fucking cabinet role? If they happen to be men, so goddamn be it.

    This is Jezebel, bud. You have to speak like a fucking emotionless robot that doesn’t even make any *implications* as to who should be hired.

    I starred your comment because I generally agree, however, Rachel Maddow does enunciate extremely well, and is why I believe she would actually be well-suited for that role.

    But how can she say an “half-women cabinet” when she doesn’t even know who is out there that can serve in every single position? It just may happen that a black man is better for...secretary of labor, for instance.

    Best comment, thanks.

    How? Let’s say you have a guy with a PhD in Middle Eastern history with a religious history angle vs. a woman with a Bachelor’s in history. You’re picking for Secretary of State. Who do you choose?

    “Give everybody an equal shot and hey, if you end up with 100% women that’s fine.”

    I’m a Bernie supporter, but I will damn well consider her if Liz Warren happens to want to be her VP. That’s a promise.

    Of course, REGARDLESS OF THEIR ABILITY TO DO THEIR JOB. She didn’t mention that part...

    “That was a nausea-inducing, scalding insult!”

    You mean, only coyotes fall when they look down...

    I thought the first Pistons championship was over the Lakers? Then the second was over the Blazers? (I didn’t look up NBA champs before posting this.)

    ...but the effing Bad Boys beat them.

    Shit. Fine, 1996 rules.

    So, how do you think the Bulls would neutralize Curry? Or even Klay Thompson? Also, they would have a lot of issues trying to guard Draymond Green.

    You, my friend, are splitting hairs. :P