AC: Valhalla doesn't hold a candle to Ghost of Tsushima. 

For PSVR you have to use the PS4 version. Also for some games you have to launch the PS4 version to transfer your save to the PS5 version. But at least you only need to do that once. And if the enhancements aren’t much people might rather have the PS4 game on an external drive instead of installing the PS5 version on…

Pretty much, but good luck telling McConnell that. That would require that fascist bastard to actually care about the people he’s supposed to be working for.

Hmm, that’s usually a TV setting. Did you dig around in your TV’s menus? Is the TV’s “Zoom” mode on? Is it happening with other games on the same console?

Putting a pin here so I can come back later to see how having a seizure is unfair criticism of the christ-game that is beyond reproach  

If your logic was that it’s the same as using a camera, though, you would absolutely “invert” the x axis. To make a camera look right, you’d push it to the left. 

The tripod reasoning only holds up on the Y axis but falls apart on the X, because to turn the camera left on a tripod you push the handle to the right. Unless you’re inverting both axes, you’re not using tripod mechanics.

I’m not sure that it’s even as complex as scientists are figuring. It seems to me to just be a perception of the camera. This isn’t the original image I remember (saw one around 15 years or so ago that was largely the same) but it’s the same principle.

Every time I see an article like this it just reminds me, as is even pointed out in the body of the article itself, that almost no one has a properly calibrated monitor or TV.

Officially, Other is earmarked “for system data needed for games and apps to work properly.” How much space it takes up is dependent “on how your console is being used.” Noted. But beyond the console’s frustratingly vague script

The moment I truly fell in love with Beyond Light was with the jump puzzle in the Deep Stone Crypt raid. It was masterful in its glory and breathtaking for my squad playing. And when it opened up the new areas that weren’t even in the raid itself? That was truly special.

And none of those is even remotely similar to what goes on in that clip.

Not always Reagan. Sometimes Nixon got there first.

wut.

Reagan wasn’t bad for my family, either. Doesn’t mean he wasn’t a nightmare for people who don’t look like me.

Not a review (it's literally tagged 'editorial' at the top) and this is not a site (not just Kotaku, but Gizmodo as a whole) that is apolitical, because nothing is. For someone boasting about their age, that post is incredibly infantile.

I’m old enough. He was a scumbag surrounded by scumbags And you don’t want to *not* read about politics here, you just don’t want politics that don’t hew to the St Ronnie line.

This wasn’t a review, and the shit that Reagan did during his administration was abominable, and that’s just how he dealt with the AIDS crisis alone. Beyond that, his bass-ackwards economic polices, proven not to work and since been deemed a failure by the fucking architect of the policy are still somehow considered…

From the word go, Call of Duty was always the slightly creepier, more jingoistic take on ‘historic’ AAA shooters. Early on, it was likely just a way to distinguish itself from Medal of Honor’s more Spielbergian approach to identical subject matter. But as time’s gone on and Call of Duty delved into more contemporary…

Any time you hear about something incredibly corrupt destroying American lives, turns out Reagan helped it get there.