As the owner, Apple *should* provide you with a method to unlock your phone. However, because the owners are involved with a MURDER INVESTIGATION (and possible terrorism, but I doubt it), yes, they *must* provide it.

It will only work on that phone because that’s what the FBI requested (and it appears they don’t WANT a universal tool). In theirbrequest, they said that they don’t even need to get custody of the software itself, or be the people that do that actual unlock. They said it was perfectly fine for Apple techs to unlock…

It’s pretty shitty case, actually. This isn’t even a warrant issue, the OWNER OF THE PHONE (the county, it was a work issued phone) WANTS THE FBI TO UNLOCK IT.

No, because power=fuel, so increased power comes at the expense of reduced range.

Whoever told you the An-2 is “invisible to radar” was lying to you and/or stupid. Rest assured that reality is completely opposite of that statement.

Counterpoint: There’s probably dozens live, but dud, missiles sticking out of the sand in any number of mideast countries. If China HAS to have one of these, they probably already scooped them up.

Given the 4 wing tanks, it’s probably a KA-6 tanker, a crucial piece of any long range strike package.

It’s either a -300 or -400. It has the expanded upper deck.

You, quite simply, are talking out of your ass. Neither AV-8 or F-35B will *ever* take off vertically on an actual mission. Simple math, guy, in order to take off vertically, thrust > weight.

A sub going 20kts in shallow waters (where this thing is designed to hunt) is going to be so loud it won’t be able to hide from anyone. Just because a sub can travel at X speed, does not mean it does it in a combat zone. As a general rule, the faster you want to go quietly, the deeper you have to be. 20kts will…

Definitely NOT nuclear. It probably has a huge tank of gas and is designed to not go very fast, both to save fuel and to keep noise down. Loud ass engines make it hard to listen for quiet subs.

Except it’s not natural. This would not be happening now if it wasn’t for us. We created the conditions for this.

Oddly, in some ways a complicated jet like a 737 is easier to land than a smaller, simpler aircraft.

Your econ is weak, son.

I’ve seen schools that *still* have some business majors in the liberal arts college. That’s where they grew from, before becoming so large they became a college unto themselves.

That thing is God awful fuck ugly.

Neat thing about the screen is that its aspect ratio is √2, which means when you divide it in half (as split screen apps would) the aspect ratio of each side is *still* √2.

You’re so bankrupt all you have left are misapplied memes. Admit you were wrong and all will be forgiven. You’re not the first person to make an ass of himself on the internet.

Legally? Probably not, but as I said, it depends on their exact arrangement. Should be in the SEC filings though.

You’re drawing a distinction where none exists. Yahoo owns 1/5 of Alibaba. Depending on how the ownership is structured, they may be entitled to more than 1/5 of its profits and may have a vote greater than its ownership stake too.