iamnid
iamnid
iamnid

When did this column stop being “Nice price or Crack Pipe?”

To be fair, I initially thought that first picture was the rear of a 2011 or 2012 Durango.

Only those strongly left-leaning need apply.

Congratulations, you’re being THAT guy.

Ok Ford, we get it.  The damn doors are removable.  Now can you put them back on?  I doubt any of the press at this event was impressed getting dirt all over their legs.  Not to mention how hard it is to find a photo which shows what the Bronco looks like with the doors ON -- which is how 99.9% of people will have it

I remember the late 80s, early 90s when this started to become a thing. I remember the name for this at the time: Integrated bumpers.  I initially hated them but it is hard to imagine a modern car looking good without them now.  Cars with separate bumpers were easier to fix though and less damage was caused by a

I love that the wording below the Dodge Neon concept claims it had a number of environmentally friendly attributes... and apparently also has a 2-stroke engine.

Jason,

Agreed -- it appears to be a misunderstanding.  I enjoy how this article keeps making the argument for racism anyway though.

Agreed, it wouldn’t be a very interesting car site if it was only about what people needed.  We don’t “need” trucks, we don’t “need” sports cars, SUVs, etc. 

There are special chargers in many tesla supercharger locations to accommodate a vehicle with a trailer -- they exist.

Uncomfortable to whom?  Let people drive what they want to drive.

If you’re arguing that the 300k in the area need to use the charger, it’s a false argument. Most people will simply charge at home. Superchargers are mostly for persons traveling through an area. You’ve brought up a very limited circumstance where it MIGHT not work be as convenient as a gas car to prove your point.

Model 6. 🤔🤨

Who has Tesla money...” $35,000 for the entry-level Model 3 a little rich for your blood?

Yes, my advice would be to skip both the boxster AND the gladiator and head immediately to an optometrist and get your eyes checked.

“should have shown up 5 years ago when the economy was fat.”

Thank you, and there’s no indication as to whether the car in the video had this option.  Furthermore, despite the article, there’s nothing indicating that the car was operating in any type of semi-autonomous mode when this accident happened.

Is there any indication that the driver was using autopilot or are we just speculating for fun?  Cars without autopilot crash all the time -- why would this be any different?  Unless the driver had autopilot engaged, there’s no reason to expect the car to stop on its own in this situation.  Additionally, if you have

it isn’t a $7,000 option -- auto-pilot is standard on all models -- you’re thinking of the “Full Self Driving” option which costs that much.