Good lord, I haven't touched this... "thing" since I was like, 11 years old and was fascinated by pixelated breasts in a video game.
Good lord, I haven't touched this... "thing" since I was like, 11 years old and was fascinated by pixelated breasts in a video game.
Lots of full games still going on! I love the multiplayer. I'm not too good at it, but it's a lot of fun. Plus, there's one mode that has cutscenes between rounds that incorporate all the players and it's really cool to see. It adds a story to the multiplayer.
But I'm not saying they should just freely give it away. I'd be perfectly fine with it being a paid DLC and would instantly buy it. I just don't want to pay full price for the game again, just to get these new tweaks and additions.
It's okay, I used to succumb to my favorite series when a new game came out, even if there were changes or practices I wasn't very happy about (Far Cry 2, Halo Reach, GTA IV, etc.).
Well, depending on where you preorder a game like GTA V, you could be charged well before the game came out, so it's the same in that regard. The money goes toward the game being developed.
Stop acting like an asshole every time you reply.
And even skinny kids love Garfield! And lasagna.. Mmm..
Thank you for having common sense. Too many people are acting like they're forced to buy DLC, and ignore the fact that price drops/sales/bundled versions inevitably come out sooner or later. If they don't like that DLC is going to be in a game, then they should just not buy the game. Pay for what you want, and vote…
And you're perceiving it as not being a "full game" because..? What, that they announced future DLC, and announced the ability to buy a higher tiered version that will include said DLC? That's like complaining that Half-Life 1 wasn't a "full game" because it didn't include Opposing Force or Blue Shift, or Grand Theft…
Who's to say it could be included in the original game on release? They said future DLC, not Day-One DLC, which would indeed be worth complaining about.
From what I understand, they're still getting the full base game. They now are just upset that there's a higher tiered version that includes future DLC.
You could say that about any game though! I paid for GTA V, but now that money they earned from the purchases will be used to further support the game with DLC, I demand to get that DLC for free, because the base game wasn't enough.
T'was my very first handheld gaming system, and my second ever gaming console, the first being the NES.
I used to play the first level of that Tom & Jerry GameGear game as a kid and could never beat it. Same goes for that Golden Axe game that was on there. I sucked at games, but damn did I have tons of fun wasting away…
Who cares? Paid DLC is everywhere, and no matter what you are getting the full game if you backed the Kickstarter. Why do gamers feel so entitled to all future content for a game now? Like, for example, the people whining and complaining that the Season Pass for Borderlands 2 only lasted a season, and there's going to…
No one has said that, though.
I'm not sure your rant really belongs on this article.. You're getting pissy because the physics are silly? And then going off on how games aren't as realistic as possible yet? Um, okay.
This. This so much. I really hope they don't force us to either buy a new copy. At the least I would hope, if not DLC (free or paid, whatever works), then give a discount to owners of the original SS.
Wow, that title had me really worried that it was being cancelled or something.
Anyone know if this stuff will be DLC for people who already own the game? I'd hate to have to re-buy the game just for these additions!
But yeah, consider me confused too.
Seriously! Way to read the article and see that you need to use spoiler tags of some kind! :/