Good fucking riddance. Rot in hell motherfucker.

My point is…

Exactly. It already failed twice.

First things first, Trump always finds lawyers because 1) there’s no shortage of scumbag Saul Goodman lawyers in the US and 2) because they all think that they’ll be the one to get Trump what he wants & will then be rewarded. They’re all even dumber than Trump is.

The idea that anyone would take her case at all is mystifying.

I would’ve posted the gif, but I haven’t been able to post pics/gifs for several months now. Tried on both Firefox & Chrome, with & without adblocks, but the button just doesn’t work. Some people have said the same, yet others continue to be able.

Either way, cops have repeatedly proven that they don’t deserve any benefit of the doubt. Until there’s absolutely clear footage of Reed firing first, I’m gonna assume that the cops are lying.

rooted in her firing from Star Wars series The Mandalorian

I think the point is that when first reading the subhead, one might parse the phrase “abuse from Tom Holland” and momentarily think that Holland himself was perpetrating the abuse

To me, it reads like they want someone to respond to Tom Holland’s abuse

No, they’re not. Read it again. It’s amazing how many of you can’t fucking read.

Thanks for proving that the words OP quoted are inaccurate. Can’t you fucking read?

Thanks for proving me right. Why can’t people fucking read?

I suspect we’ll learn more about what went down and why in the coming days.

None of that justifies 5 cops firing 96 times. The criminal penalty for everything you described is not summary execution. Cops aren’t supposed to be executioners.

Making the Cybertruck bulletproof is a neat party trick

Chicago police claim…

No, it’s not. But that’s ok, I get it. Reading is hard.

Tesla made a stupid design decision? I’m shocked, shocked I say!

Reading the subhead in full dispels that notion, of course.