I think the point is that when first reading the subhead, one might parse the phrase “abuse from Tom Holland” and momentarily think that Holland himself was perpetrating the abuse

To me, it reads like they want someone to respond to Tom Holland’s abuse

No, they’re not. Read it again. It’s amazing how many of you can’t fucking read.

Thanks for proving that the words OP quoted are inaccurate. Can’t you fucking read?

Thanks for proving me right. Why can’t people fucking read?

I suspect we’ll learn more about what went down and why in the coming days.

None of that justifies 5 cops firing 96 times. The criminal penalty for everything you described is not summary execution. Cops aren’t supposed to be executioners.

Making the Cybertruck bulletproof is a neat party trick

Chicago police claim…

No, it’s not. But that’s ok, I get it. Reading is hard.

Tesla made a stupid design decision? I’m shocked, shocked I say!

Reading the subhead in full dispels that notion, of course.

It’s in the summary below the title

Hudson was first stopped in early January this year for driving recklessly in downtown Seattle around 1:30 a.m. Officers gave him a verbal warning about speeding in highly populated city areas, and he was released.

“about the abuse from Tom Holland,”

Funny how when you out yourself as a white supremacist edge-lord, people don’t want to buy from you. Not to mention the known issues with the vehicles.

Oh hell no. I’ve got pretty good headphones. Screaming kid over fresh shit smell every fucking day.

However, he also has something else. Something deeper.

Without re-useable boosters

What he did with Tesla paved the way to EVs becoming widespread.