You can’t possibly compare SCUD missiles to these new Chinese IRBMs. For one thing, Saddam never launched chemical weapons during the Gulf War, otherwise you can bet there would indeed have been a nuclear response. Second, we had very effective countermeasures against the SCUD. And third, even the missiles that got…

For these hardware in action in CG check this (By the courtesy of Tencent)

so you would wait and see.

That’s not how military calculus works. We’re not very big on giving the benefit of the doubt when it comes to ballistic missile launches.

SOON.

I have a hard time looking at military vehicles with white wall tires.

Doesn’t really matter tbh. Cross a certain “red line” and that five ship flotilla would quickly become the latest man-made reef courtesy of one Los Angeles Class attack submarine.

A few low fly-overs by a Posesidon loaded up with Harpoons on it’s hard points might be an appropriate response. Just swung by to say “hello”.

Five whole ships, eh? That’s cute.

That would be complete suicide. Sure they might destroy the oil terminal*, but the US Pacific Fleet would be right off the coast of China to deliver a counter strike. And that’s assuming the exchange didn’t go nuclear.

And I’m sure we have at least one sub that they can’t see tracking their every move. Joke’s on them.

Yep. Obama just asked for new Ice Breakers yesterday:

Time for us to build some islands and draw a nine dash line around the entire Pacific Ocean.

Kelly, don’t be fooled by pro-needle stabbing propaganda. The government doctors are all shadow illuminati lizswords (lizards made of swords) that are trying to fill us with chemtrails for control and to take prayer out of schools. What I’m trying to tell you is that jet fuel can’t melt steel beams.

You list a bunch of people who “should” have guns. You realize your list could conceivably cover every american, right? I don’t get your point there.

Honestly, if they wanted to limit gun ownership to people in militias, the easiest workaround is to start creating civilian militias that you pay a membership to join. I imagine they’d do most of their advertising in gun shops, trade shows and magazines, and the people who want to own guns will all be members or this…

Stop. I’m not a gun advocate, but this is the type of response that shuts down any type of discussion just as fast as “BUT IT’S IN THE CONSTITUTION”.

What makes you think it is that easy? Can you name one thing a government has tried to ban that has been effectively banned? I’ve been asking this question for years now and no one has come up with an answer. Give it a shot.

Let me correct that for you. “If the US Navy got involved they would be easily found.”

I believe this is the photo of ROK forces capturing a grounded N. Korean sub a few years back?