Ho, love this.

Stick to soccer, Haisley.

this is extra tasty now!

Huff: [puffs]

Gah, same! It’s such a comfortable ride. But my wife said it looked like a hearse, so it’s out.

thats a good dog

When I was a park ranger I had to kick a guy out for throwing these all around the park like confetti. He was strangely unfamiliar with the word “proselytizing.” I saved a few because I thought they were hilarious.

My wife made me watch Nosedive this weekend - my first Black Mirror experience - and I spent the whole time marveling at this very plausible future depicted. That top-down panning shot of all the interlocking highway overpasses above residential neighborhoods gave me more agita than the electric smartphone-cars,…

It appears you have bad taste. I’m terribly sorry!

Sounds like my kind of orchard! Going this Sunday with the wife and another couple. I’m optimistic (and already stoned).

Yeah, but the question is do you think there’d be any value in the comments left on that piece? (no)

Apple picking - bullshit fall activity or pleasant seasonal experience?

I told this to my Cubs fan friend this morning. He hadn’t even thought about it. Poor bastards.

take a step back my man

If anything I’m a fan of the ground clearance. The profile is very nice but I’m just not sure about that double face

I bet it has component inputs!

See my other replies. You’re all assuming opening up challenge rules doesn’t increase the average of less than 1 challenge used per game, I assume it does.

Again, the historical average is less than 1 challenge a game - increase the number of challengeable calls and you will increase the avg number of challenges - especially in the first half, when timeouts aren’t as important.

Someone else made that point, but historically you see an average of less than 1 challenge per game and increasing the number of challengeable aspects can only increase that. This article from last year loops in penalties in pointing to longer games as well but I think it’s definitely something to consider: http://www.…

That’s a fair point.