humptydumpedyou
HumptyDumpedYou
humptydumpedyou

I can't believe someone already had this here. It's my favorite word.

catastro-fuck?

Or just link to the story that has his response (ebeneezer splooge posted it below)?

It's okay Mr. Diamondstein, no one is coming for your law license. But in a just world they would.

This is when having a bunch of law and order fans pretending they know what a lawyer does is particularly harmful to the discussion.

He wasn't in court, he arguably lied (which violates the ethics rules) and the backlash from having misrepresented what was on the tape (and the "hypothetical" victim-blaming necessary to do so) is what cost his client a multi-million dollar contract and possibly the privilege of earning a living as a football player

How well is he doing his job if the video he misrepresented ended up being the reason his client was banned from the only way he's ever made a living?

He may have an issue with Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 4.1:

Could be that his limited partners asked him to fire the GM and forced his hand on the investigation:

That's a pretty tame mugshot, all things considered. I was expecting Busey-esque.

What kind of distance between phone and watch is supported? I'm thinking of when I need to charge my phone at home or when I'm not wearing pockets. I guess I wouldn't expect it to work from 100 yards, but hoping the other side of the house isn't out of the question.

Explain how my theory (that he can sell the team whenever he wants so he doesn't need trickery) relies on his email being racist. Then, explain how it relies on the email being racist moreso than does your theory that he wants out and fast and therefore did something racist.

Not if you just remind yourself not to be a bitter old fuck. You'll notice that it's not every guy his age that's like that.

I will give you some credit for starting at victim blaming and ending up trying to make a more nuanced argument, but based on where you started, claiming that you have some deep concern for victims of abuse seems disingenuous:

Doesn't he have to yell something about "THE U" after that?

You can like whoever you want, and we'll be happy for you on the off chance that you guys don't get skull-fucked in the super bowl, but you don't get to treat people who similarly don't do anything at all involved with their favorite NFL team and then act like your geographically convenient team choice somehow is

It's an interesting theory, but you can get the sale all but still pretty improbable. You're right that people would look at the financials and come to the same conclusions he did, then they'll offer him about $1.2B and buy the team because financially you don't buy a team for annual profit (you do it for asset

Yes. Never punch a woman in the face. Also don't punch men in the face. Or anyone else.

Congrats, that's how an adult handles that situation. Punching her in the face is definitely not.

I don't mean to downplay what happened to you at all, but your point is now that we should all assume that the less likely of two possibilities is definitely the thing that was happening here? Based on the fact that anecdotal evidence from your own TOTALLY UNRELATED personal history makes you think that's the case?