It was down 13, but the point stands. I remember because the play-by-play guy just said: "13 points, that won't do any good"

Do you often lose sleep over the things the mean commenters say?

you're thinking of the old system, now even I'm allowed to make comments.

I agree that the amount of discovery probably didn't prejudice the trial. At the same time, you seem to be both taking the prosecutions word on the relevance of evidence and assuming that a lawyer would continue reviewing discovery well after the end of the trial. Did they also ask if he was ever able to complete his…

Not really, just that it's being investigated. Martha Stewart, I believe, was convicted only of her obstruction of justice, but no underlying crime.

While it's not a good argument, the "possible" and likely argument is that Bonds was a dick to a few more people than Clemens and these fat fuck old sportswriters think that that matters.

I guess as long as you assume that he continued to review the discovery after the trial, then that fact is of some value. But, I'm not sure why he would since he's no longer Sandusky's attorney, right?

Sorry, seemed equally reasonable that you were just calling Cutler a pussy.

His expertise in "pussy" is laid out pretty clearly in the article.

It's a one paragraph article that you bothered clicking on to correct but didn't then read? I can understand that the one paragraph seemed daunting, but in the first sentence, the first words are "Rose Bowl officials...".

Maybe he means that the arrests are overrated? OJ Simpson murdered people and committed armed robbery... Clarett just gets drunk and acts like a dummy.

I'm sort of annoyed at how I kept clicking on comments ready to rebut them and you kept beating me to it... but those are good points. And I don't think anyone is a Cardinals fan.

Maybe you missed the joke wherein RMJ=H beat the real people that missed the joke to the punch... irony is hard.

Yeah, he's being super-sarcastic and, until you took it seriously, I thought it was the dumbest thing I ever read.

Fans of the English language will say that's a little self-indulgent and probably three more sentences than you needed.

Probably Reggie Wayne

Hey! I miss hockey enough as it is, there's no need to pylon.

I agree. But, if the issue is the pros don't want some dope who just showed up on a collapsable bike to driver their Ferrari, fine, charge them more and have the guy show up in a town car. I don't think there's a difference between the two, but if the driver quality is the hangup for the players, it should be an easy…

Agree, but at the same time, something along this line needs to be the offered league service. For the money the service would make, the security firm used in the article should be able to have someone trained to drive fancy cars and then have him dropped off to give the player a ride home, with the trail car used to…

I didn't realize that was the same douche that made the first post. The second one, read alone, sounded to me like he was acknowledging the Commerce Clause was "wide open" to justify just about anything, but doing so while being mad about it... which is sort of my stance on those cases. Read with the first one, it's…