The “problem” will sort itself out when no one buys this. You’re playing right into this guy’s hands. How many people have now heard about the game through free viral marketing? It’s funny how people can make shooting games about any other setting and people wouldn’t bat an eye. But hey, let’s do the truly American…

so beating your kids is bad....but beating your wife....ok....... cool

There is a difference when the game implicitly features the rampant murder of children. GTA, whatever its merits and flaws, focuses its violence on adults.

I mean sure this game lets you play as an active shooter purposefully but there are plenty of times I played as an active shooter in GTA as well. Nothing like going on a mass killing spree and then getting into a chase and holing myself up inside the strip club while I mow people down. What are people’s take on this?…

The world didn’t end when Super Columbine RPG came out. It won’t end if ths game comes out or even if it does well. It is tacky and tasteless, but better that it is out there than we all jump on the Moral Majority train to ban what offends us.

Okay, I’d say is this is a disproportionate amount of outrage.

Oh God, just fucking stop. Stop giving the away the entire fucking argument to people who want to blame video games for mass shootings. I don’t care if it’s insensitive. So was Postal. It has nothing to do with what’s in good taste. It has everything to do with how these demands for “sensitivity” every time a game, or…

what about bronies? *checks avatar* uh-oh

around the same time that shame disappeared or became and ugly word. we are free to do or say anything......the internet fucked ruined us

“Original Ghostbusters star slams reboot in epic Tweetstorm.”

I mean, every since io9 stopped being it’s own thing and got consolidated into Gizmodo, yeah kinda.

Yeah, that headline was way too sensational and click-baity. But apparently that is the io9's way now.

Clicks don’t get themselves.

“One lingering gripe” constitutes “attacking” someone now? It’s not even an unfair gripe. And all he did was reiterate what Reitman already said, to io9, 3 months ago.

Welp, I’m sorry for you I suppose.

Everybody was waifu fighting

Kotaku has even had articles about how fan-service-y this game is. I’m also struggling to understand how this event is any worse.

“Flattening characters that are fleshed out in the main series has always been at the core of Fire Emblem Heroes for men and women alike, but adding the context of matrimonial imagery…

These seem to have a target at boys/men who are inexperienced/naive/childish about “love”/relationships. It presents sort of these “women” who you are absolutely obtainable*, as long as you jump through the right hoops. Which ignores sort of one of the most important, yet devastating things about real life; you can’t…

Ehhh?