I thought this was going to turn into a "Who's on first?" situation.
I thought this was going to turn into a "Who's on first?" situation.
“my Uber" Wait, were you the driver?
He reminds of a great quote about Wagner: "First-rate composer, fourth-rate human being."
Luntz = Eichmann?
Very true, this. Hannah and Her Sisters is my favorite. I’ve stopped trying to avoid films made by people I don’t like, it’s just no worth it. Instead I avoid films which themselves are horrible (Sandler, Bay). I loathe Eastwood, but I wouldn’t prohibit anyone from watching Unforgiven. Same can be said of Literature.…
This. When he has managed to pontificate upon the potential of losing, this is almost always his answer. A few have pointed out how dangerous this is, and then, like anything concerning this dumpster-fire of a campaign, it is quickly forgotten. Our ability to stand behind the decision of a presidential election, no…
Sorry to make yet another story about Trump, but to anyone who believes his “what do you have to lose?”, and I hope there are few: just take a look at Schlafly and her racial politics and understand that there is a lot to lose. She was an ardent Trump supporter as well as segregationist and this should be brought up…
The party of Lincoln wants the Confederate flag flown everywhere and yells "States rights!" quicker than Calhoun in a huff about slavery. I see nothing strange here.
Very nice. I’ve always found it spectacularly naïve and admirably optimistic (non-aggressive principle - lol good one!), but the combination, and of course the crazies it lures in, makes for a dangerously dogmatic and shielded ideology. Blind spots galore!
Exactly. When he decided to support Trump, a man who wants to infinitely increase the power of the government to spy on its people, he killed any notion that he was a libertarian. Which isn't to say that being a libertarian is a good thing; it's an ideology for spoiled little precious snowflakes.
Thanks Obama!
Well if he's nominated to SCOTUS we may get to keep him forever. I know there's almost no chance of this but it would be such a fuck you to the obstructionists. "You don't want to approve one of my nominees? Watch this."
After January we may get it for free.
Huh? Where did I mention that I was a cohort of conspiracy theorists? I think you’re confusing my rhetoric with someone else's, or are phenomenally stupid. I'll go with both.
We’re talking about the kind of people who think Newtown was faked, so testimony by every other living soul probably won’t be good enough. The nefarious solipsism of conspiracy theorists can rarely be cracked.
In different circumstances Jordan and Isiah's behaviors would probably be sociopathic, but since they played sportsball they're heroes. Ain't sports great!
There’s no dealing with people who think the charity organization watchers are all part of the liberal cabal hell bent on destroying America, and believe me I’ve had these conversations. So then how do you convince them the Clinton Foundation does any good? You can't. I actually wish the ‘liberal media’ was actually a…
Fucking Amen! All this talk about pay-to-play with Hillary when Trump has ‘literally’ given Pam Bondi money, from his own foundation, to not investigate TrumpU. Oh I’m sorry, I meant to say that he contributed to her reelection campaign and then she happened to drop the investigation into TrumpU rather coincidentally.…
Ah I remember that, what a fuckwit. This country has an unhealthy obsession with sports (says the person posting on a sports blog).
I’m trying to imagine which players wouldn’t actually do this. Jordan? Kobe? A.C .Green?