Like who, which critic does that? That’s a ridiculous straw man

How are you any different with your “dude”?

That’s enough internet for today, grandad. let’s get you back to bed

32 here, everyday I wake up and thank god I never became a "slang when I was young is good and all other slang is bad" person. Seems bleak.

Man you do sound old

You will be unsurprised to learn that this take is just as wrong about Bastion/Transistor/Pyre/Hades as it is about Final Fantasy 1-3.

I’ve heard four or five different ways to distinguish between roguelikes and rogue-lites, including progressing between runs, the use of obscured information (e.g. potions with an effect you can only discern by drinking them), turn-based action, and more. It just doesn’t seem like a valuable way to distinguish between…

What about the benefit that the game is better because of early feedback from a large number of players?

Side note: Why “Hades 2"? Why not name it after, you know, the game’s main character?

A sequel to one of the best ever games gets announced and this guy has nothing but complaints.

I like how, as always whenever you mock Piker’s lavish lifestyle, you immediately get the completely Musk Weird Nerd-esque dishonest “are you expecting him to live in a hole” stuff as though there’s no comfortable standard of living below having a multi-million dollar house and a $200,000 car that still exceeds that…

I know I joke about him basically being the guy from Fifteen Million Credits (someone who’s commodified collective anti-capitalist outrage into an individually-enriching capitalist product) but taking part in what is essentially free publicity for a multibillion dollar conglomerate that, amongst many far more serious…

ah yes “just don’t play any 1 drops after pool 1" seems like a great way to completely disenfranchise new players. Or the developers could look at WHY killmonger is a problem.

The problem a lot of people seem to be unable to fully grasp is that an unfaithful adaptation isn’t necessarily a bad one. The Witcher Netflix series while not faithful to the source material is a great series. The same is true for the video game series.

John Carpenter’s The Thing is completely unfaithful to the source…

Not bad. You held it together for 4 whole sentences before you let your inner child out. Might have been able to make a salient point ... but no, you had to go to childish insults, which just totally cut the legs off from anything else you might have said.

I don’t know if it’s good vs great as much as risk-averse vs risk-taking.

Why the fuck should they pay her twice their original offer for her to do the work and 8x what she lied and claimed they offered her to try and get her to not lie?

I don’t know if it’s the main reason, but if the person whose tweet got linked deletes it because they don’t appreciate the extra traffic, then suddenly the embed is useless. Also if text in a photo is transcribed it’s searchable on the site and by search engine, shows up in reader mode on mobile, can be read by…

There’s nothing to wait for.

thank YOU :)