"vaguely sexual"
Video of björk's vagina inside a bigger björk's vagina all inside another vagina. And they ooze sex fluid. If anything about that was vague to you I think you should should try this thing called the internet. Or you have had too much internet.

I saw him murder a hobo. He is a well known serial rapist.

In your step-father-in-law's defense, french* people are very stupid. So he probably doesn't know any better.

Watching this movie made me realize I have a psychic ability to predict female masturbation in films 10 seconds in advance. Until then I thought my "guesses" during Das Experiment and Mulholland Drive were flukes.

bismuth rhodium molybdenum

I am male and one of the few people I know who cares about acting. Don't ask who, I don't store that kind of information. The rest of acting-carers I know are a despicable cabal of nic cage haters.

Please die in a fire, apostate. The One True Recording will grind dance on your grave.

What?

Don't leave us in suspense! How often is it identical to the religious kind? Is it never? 13%? Less?

I would just like to say that I think you are a charitable soul for indulging Steve Rogers so long in his trollish buffoonery.

Because her's a pretty good pronoun?

They should try to sell more candy during lent?

It's kind of like Obama. If every criticism you have levied against him has gotten you accused of racism, maybe it's not Obama's fault, but yours. I really can't assess the level of meta humor intended in your comment, though. Please let me know whether to upvote or downvote you.

Same here. "…complicated civil rights issue" is what threw me. Prison-industrial complex: complicated civil rights issue. Gay marriage: simple civil rights issue; complicated social/political issue.

No it is not weird or uncommon, no it is not fake, and no you did not do it intentionally but I agree with NormalityQuake (assuming I correctly interpreted his terrible job of explaining) that it is "in [your] head". I think the fundamental disagreement here stems from different underlying assumptions about the role…

I thought we were called gamelogicians. Is it gamelogiteers?

Your interpretation of his first comment was correct, He is just trying to backpedal his statement into meaningless vagueness ("many people"? yeah, ok) because he realized he formed his opinion quickly and sloppily. Sort of like when fastandsloppy's extremely vocal relatives who watch lifetime comment on how "many…

I AFTEST-ED THIFLSH
OFFAL EN ENJLS

You should have compared it to RF sensitivity. An actual physiological reaction not directly caused by the offending stimulus. Sort of like how I vomit if I eat onions as long as I know they're there. Unless this guy is some kind of medical miracle. In which case I am very intrigued. Does every kind of smoke sicken…

Hold on I think there's already a word for that and it's "imbecile".