hrorekrslonvanbaugi
HrorekrSlonvanbaugi
hrorekrslonvanbaugi

I appreciate the server giving me as much information as possible, especially if the place is unconventional or unusual in some way.

You don’t have to explain it, it’s just the sort of thing that only your ego thinks is funny. You had to smash that garlic seven times, you clearly don’t know enough about what you’re doing to pull it off. Calling the original video of knifing garlic cloves out of a head a cooking hack is a little like calling

Let me propose an alternate explanation, Mr. Allen: PC culture doesn’t exist. Rather the people whom you’ve been insulting all this time finally have enough freedom and autonomy to call you on your bullshit.

Ah well, assuming I didn’t signal sarcasm strongly enough, I’m being flip. I’m suggesting that we might expect riots in Texas for someone using this law to donate to non-christian or otherwise controversial groups, since it’s clearly meant to promote state sanctioned Christianity. As for me, I think all organized relig

Solicit donations from sympathetic fast food restaurants. None of which will want any of this action.

For, say, donating to radical muslim causes? I would expect that to be fine in Texas.

There is a whole lot of unspoken expectation here. How do you know that your SO even understands what dirty or cleaning is in the same way you do? So many people believe that whatever position they’ve absorbed passively over their entire lives is universal and should be respected and observed by everyone. You don’t

I can explain this, at least from my standpoint: I don’t know why those things are there. I assume if someone puts something somewhere it’s there for a reason or it would have been put away. Or, it’s some nerd bullshit of my SO’s two adult children that live with us and I have no idea what it is, what it does, or

So he shamed the ones that did show up to do their job.

And yet here we are again. Your restraint is remarkable.

No, it’s not the job of the writer to clearly state things.

Ethnicity” is always coded langauge for “skin color.”

That usage of “only” is covered by “all.” Semantically, what I highlighted is a valid reading of the properties described. A true statement would be:

Cool, rock on journalist word man! You obviously know what you’re saying better than the people trying to understand what you actually wrote. Clearly there is syntax for only of which I was unaware having only been speaking and writing the language for half a dozen decades.

Well, you think that because you’re a bigot. When I said, “...people similar to themselves with similar backgrounds...” all you heard was skin color. Intelligent people know that this has no bearing at all on what makes a good legislator. I didn’t vote for Barak Obama because he has the same skin color as me (he

It’s interesting that, in an assessing complex issues of race, diversity, gender, and voter demographics your takeaway is that democrats are the party of “fuck white men.” The part is still overwhelmingly represented by white men. Now, though, Americans are voting for people similar to themselves with similar

“I have faith in the Democrats’ ability to fuck things up.”

All (and only) multiples of 2 end in 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8.
All (and only) multiples of 5 end in 5 or 0.

Yes. It won the fight for her. Unwritten rules are bullshit.