hott3443545
hottakes and maple syrup
hott3443545

I’m not dismissive of Canadians, I’m dismissive of you, just as I’m dismissive of anyone that relies on the tired, misguided “giant douche vs. turd sandwich” philosophy.

traditional TV connection.

No, since the debates are live and start at that time.

If ever there was an election where we needed a viable C, this is certainly it. But the constant mentality that any vote for C strengths A or B is part of what prevents C from ever being viable.

Yeah, no, I didn’t. Look, either you believe in things like “logic” and “evidence” and “proof”, where we can discuss this more, or you believe in “anger” and “emotion” and “conspiracy theories”, in which case we can’t talk because you’re off in your little head-cloud and nothing will ever get through to you.

I appreciate your efforts, Emp, but trolls are allergic to facts and logical reasoning.

Ugh, I’ve got to hand it to you; you know how to troll. Just for the people who think you’re serious, though: you have given no evidence that Clinton’s character is flawed or “repugnant,” and you’re still just relying on ad hominem attacks. An anecdotal story about something Trump may or may not have done does not

“I just hate seeing obscure anecdotes trying to humanize Clinton...”

I know I shouldn’t give you the time of day, but the fact that you’re going straight to ad hominem attacks is “very telling”.

So after everything that’s happened and so much constant, unending, cannot-unsee-it news for the last 12 months, you’re really still on the fence?

False equivalencies suck.

So, in addition to making a dull, obvious, self-satisfied comment, you’re actually saying that, after everything that’s happened in this campaign up to now, you haven’t been able to make up your mind and you need three TV shows to tell you how to vote? And you’re proud to admit it?