Uh dude...that isn’t what he is uh...talking about and uh...no he uh...doesn’t because uh...he said several uh...times that HR was for uh...sexual harassment so he uh...didn’t have to uh...deal with uh...them.

If you’re going to bash a politician, at least bash the right one. Ted Cruz is the one who doesn’t know what basic shit is called.

They’ve got a minor league club there. Not too much of a stretch to think MLB would be viable if the NFL and NHL do ok.

The sooner people stop acting like Shaun King knows shit about fuck, the better off this country is going to be.

Whenever someone feels the need to mention what year it is when carrying on about whatever political bullshit they’re spewing, that instantly marks them as a goddamned moron.

Believe it or not, and this may come as a shock to you, but there is a massive majority of people who don’t believe in the need to beat you over the fucking head with their politics every minute of every day. They’re mostly centrist or just on either side of it and go about their lives the same regardless of who is in…

That’s because you’re mentally weak. It’s ok. It happens.

This has got to be about the dumbest funbag you’ve ever written.

Can’t account for shitty people.

No. He got it right. You sound fascist.

Everyone needs to report to HR. Who says I’m not HR? You don’t know shit, but you think you do. Why not, fuck off instead?

Yeah....I’m still right about what HR’s function actually is. Anecdotal stories aren’t disproving that.

I’ll be the first to admit when I am. So as soon as I am in this case, I’ll let you know. I haven’t been yet, and based on your inability to disprove anything I’ve said, I won’t hold my breath.

You are, though. That’s ok. You feel like you want to go online today and be wrong, you’ve got to do you. I’m not going to be a wrongophobe against someone who so perfectly lives up to their screen name.

I mean, if you want to be wrong on the internet, I’m not here to stop you.

I am not at all wrong. You’re still conflating two things and trying to argue with me based on a premise that doesn’t exist. I’ll try to dumb it down further.

I want to say some country tried this style of policing back in the 1930's and up through...again, my memory isn’t what it used to be but I’d venture to guess 1945? They’d just go through town with a “secret” police force and round up people based on what a few people thought their crimes might be and forced them into…

You’re dealing with two separate issues here and conflating them. This isn’t hard.

You’re a homophobe because you said something about enjoying cock in my mouth and another poster and I ‘cumming on each others chests’. That’s homophobic language. You really don’t have a full compliment of functioning neurons do you?

“breaking down fast”???