holdmeclosertonydanzig
HoldMeCloserTonyDanzig
holdmeclosertonydanzig

I feel like you are on the right track. But its not about ‘fault,’ its about risk. Car accidents aren’t supposed to happen, but you wear a seatbelt anyway. Personal nudes aren’t supposed to leak, but there is always a risk for all the reasons you pointed out. And she is in a group that is at an inherent extreme risk -

Leslie Jones did not deserve this; HOWEVER, your post is such a classically bad logical stretch.

I’m not sure you understand what ‘privacy’ means. ‘Privacy’ means a reasonable expectation that nobody will ever witness whatever it is you are doing. After the Fappening and all the other ‘leaks’ that have come off the internet, you have to be foolish in the extreme to think that you have a ‘reasonable’ expectation

You are sooo getting banned for disagreeing

.

I’m going to also offer a very real and practical application of a bad precedent:

There is a very real dark side to allowing for completely fluid gender self-identification, and women will, without equivocation, bear the brunt of the unintended consequences. This issue is far more complex than just looking at it as ‘these poor person are being denied a basic civil right.” Maybe the years of

So a bunch of 20-something Jez writers spent an afternoon riling up a bunch of teenagers for a snarky article? And you all appear pretty proud of yourselves. What’s that saying about good comedy punching up, not down?

¡Gracias por su respuesta! (kidding) You are right - in all regards.

I think there’s an underwater swastika in the video from 0:58 through 1:01?

I agree with you fully, and I appreciate your well thought out answer. However, I think you are kind of demonstrating my point by giving a balanced and nuanced view that takes into consideration cultural, racial and social histories instead of simply screaming “RACISM!!!!” and being done with it, which was the full

Like anyone at Gawker Media is going to willingly overcome cultural ignorance when presented with the opportunity to reflexively scream RACISM!

His quest was to destroy the Clintons in anyway possible. If Broaddrick was even slightly believable, he would have been all over it. A credible accusation that a sitting president is a rapist? That’s political gold.

Your argument is best summarized as: Bill Clinton raped someone, and Hillary’s pro-woman response is to do nothing at all? How does that make sense? At this point, if Hillary did not know about Broaddrick, that would be indicative of a remarkable level of incompetence (Ken Starr brought this up 20 years ago).

“I still fail to see how this somehow became Hillary Clinton’s fault” —> That is the whole point of the article. I love the Biles-esque layers of mental gymnastics buried in your answer.

Nah. It’s not going to be a traditional, straight auction. In the reddit post, the guy talked about how when you contacted the seller, you would have to swap information using the secret code (trying to prove you aren’t a cop) and then negotiate vocally on a burner phone. Then a week later, you’d get a ship, full of

Counterpoint: there was a really interesting thread on reddit a few months back about the secret ways that people sell larger quantities of drugs on public websites like craigslist and/or ebay.

I like the hustle. It seems more than some others, Ashley understands what it means to ‘Get Yuuuuge and Get Out’.

Not what I’m saying at all. I’m making a semi-philosophical point about the difference between quoting statutes and how things happen in the moment.

Again, this does not settle the issue of preventing this system from being abused. The devil remains in the details. In a contested convention, you really think that a party that stands to lose will sit there and do nothing? That’s why contracts/laws/etc are so specific - to head off massive fights - particularly in a