Spoken like a scientifically illiterate asshole.

Firstly, I've been around since the inception of a "public web", so take your ageist illogical nonsense and "grow up" into something less illogically driven.

All of what you said, it is my highest personal doubt that you can back any of it with some of academically relevant evidence.

So eloquent... you must be from Jezebel.

Hi, you must be new here, welcome to the internet.

Except this isn't real.

Click-bait title is click-baity. One archdiocese isn't "the church," ffs.

These are the sorts of things that highlight the importance of devs/pubs supporting the modder community.

Their Dragon's Crown coverage stands in stark disagreement with your assertion, particularly Schrier's call that companies should stop hiring artists that design sexualized characters.

You don't need to go back all that far in Kotaku's post history to see the entire Dragon's Crown snafu where they legitimately tried to paint hypersexualized character design as an inherently flawed thing that should end and even go so far as to make a few generalized arguments that gamers are bad for not feeling the…

As it relates to female character design, it's an unwinnable battle at this point. Make a sexy character and you're objectifying women. Make a woman the bad guy, and you're encouraging violence against women. Make the character perfect in some way as the hero, and you're encouraging an unobtainable ideal that, in…

I can't say I agree with you, particularly here at Kotaku when they'll post this sort of stuff, and then seemingly withing 1-2 weeks they'll post something about how it's sexist or deviant or damaging to xyz individuals in this or related industries to appreciate sexualized portrayals of anything.

Yep, particular if the artist was going for anything in the WW2 era or prior to, which was my assumption based upon the use of the iron cross.

He's not asking for a cookie, he's noting that it's ridiculous how allies are attacked for not maintaining some completely fictional and unobtainable ideal of the "perfect ally"

Any Apple product, all being horribly overpriced, has absolutely no business on this list.

Being inclusive is making a female character that represents an infinitesimal fraction of women taking steroids?

That's the point I'm making. It still doesn't change the fact that something that is found to be fun or sexy or whatever, on a subjective level. Again, you cannot necessarily even specify on an objective level as to how something is found fun or sexy because quite often, individuals differ on even this aspect of these…

It's still subjective. Even outside interpretations of attractiveness, on a scientific level, are based in qualitative and non-objective measures.

Except that you earlier called it a fact. Facts are supposedly indisputable, ie, the opposite of what you just described. In essence, the only fact here is that sexual attractiveness is utterly variable and highly dependent on a myriad of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including the amount of clothing worn.

But it cannot be denied that someone does find a specific type of person in a specific scenario sexy.