I’m not sure if this was your way with agreeing with me or if you meant to respond to the original poster (StorminMike2000) or if you misinterpreted what I wrote. Because you and I are saying basically the same thing or are at least on the same side of this.

In the same way a police officer has an obligation to report on colleagues who abuse their power or a member of Congress has the obligation to support country over party, survivors of sexual assault have an obligation to future victims to report and testify.

There is a quote (or a set of quotes) variously attributed and probably misattributed, pick your favorite wording below. But the point of the statement(s) remain the same, the press is supposed to look for the information that people are trying to suppress; especially when those people are powerful.

Nadler. Says things others may not want him to say, sometimes, even if true.

“Represantation is good but I don’t think we should be judging an individual game for choosing a setting with limited diversity.”

I think davidwizard’s response is excellent, I just have a few points.

This is admittedly supposition but I bet a large portion of those early console sales (NES, SNES, Genesis) were for kids. Not entirely, but I bet most were. As PS2/Xbox/etc. start to come out, these kids are growing up and things become more widespread as well.

The lot shown above only works as a forwards exit parking lot for those at the front, or for everyone if it is a “everyone leaves at the same time” situation. If it is a theme park, for example, people come and go at different times throughout the day. Meaning a lot of people are still backing out.

As part of one of the prior heated discussions (years ago, on one of your articles, Jason, I believe). My point then wasn’t that one was safer, it was that I simply wanted someone to point to actual evidence. Everyone was saying backing out is less safe. But there were no independent studies, no analysis, just a bunch…

Cannot tell if troll or not, will treat as real.

Thank you for this. I don’t have much to add other than to say that you and others at this site have done a lot of really amazing reporting and this is yet another read that should be required for everyone before they are allowed to comment online. Forced information. I’m sure a number of people (guys) would still be…

Everyone hated on the Lexus front ends too vociferously. Chevy couldn’t be outdone. How would they ever make more commercials if they didn’t win the JDPower award for gapingest maw?

God’s/gods’ work here, Ms. Lee.

Unfortunately the cars all suck.

Knew Dana years ago, went to high school with him, live in the area. While anything is possible, these two stories clearly don’t match up at all. And his wife’s story aligns with the Dana I knew.

This is what churches (supposed charitable organizations) should be doing. Not funding glamorous Preacher and Pastor private planes and mansions.

I’d say you’re okay.

I think a small part of the problem is that redemption is being viewed as a return to what the person was doing before knowledge of the actions was made public. So if a person is a movie star, after a period they should resume their movie making status.

I don’t get how this is a ding on the game though. I own the game and while I find it okay, it’s not the best. But the game is not Erode the Space Alien Laser Armor with 100 Shots to the Elbow and Neck. A person shot in the head dies. That’s realistic.

Thank you for destroying the disingenuous rambling of a pop-“science” hack trying to make money on the tragic circumstances of others.