Ideally. But delayed and even completely broken challenge registering has been an issue since it was released. Get 5 kills with a pistol challenge, end up with 4 pistol kills in a round but only credited for 1, maybe 0. It’s a basic function and necessary for the paid battlepass to make any sense. And yet...

Could be a couple of reasons.

Even if you take her at her word that it was a complete mistake because of everything else going on, it was her mistake, and that mistake cost a life. There have to be penalties for something like that.

I think part of your answer would be to ask yourself what you thought about it at the time?

Another part is that you don’t have to go back that far for severe racism, sexism, misogyny, etc. to all be more common. It all still exists, but it seems like it was all more accepted than it is now. Look how many people used…

Regarding this point specifically:

I wouldn’t disagree with your read of “celebrities tend to be narcissistic assholes...” However, so are most politicians. 

I’m of two minds on this. On the one hand, it does seem that maybe a lot of this was overhyped to distract us from what the other govt hand (so to speak) was doing (e.g. Iran Contra, destroying tax base).

And Biden has apologized for his stances on crime-related legislation in the 1990s. 

In addition, Clinton is white and from the south. So he’s going to bring more white southerners with him than say, Dukakis (MA). And what are a very high percentage of white males in the south? Conservatives.

Yeah, that should probably be included in the story at this point.

I do feel like I covered that there were other reasons. One of which being, things were generally good; neither falling off a cliff nor bouncing off the sky.

Oh in addition, the Clinton’s had a lot of scandals other than Lewinsky, let’s be honest. So while I found plenty of reasons to trust her—her years of public service—there were plenty of reasons to worry about the Clintons.

I would agree that the biggest reason Hillary didn’t win had to do with sexism. And it was probably the biggest reason by a wide margin.

Here’s what I don’t get. I don’t think it would be a stretch to say that a significant majority of conservative American political groups and religious sects are not pro-women.

Herr’s Jalapeno Poppers cheese curls or Grilled Cheese and Tomato Soup cheese curls.

Somewhere journalists decided that the only way to report was to report both sides of an issue as a defense against claims of bias. Because it is apparently more important to avoid claims of biased reporting than it is to report the truth. Why?

For me, it’s not stop funding NASA. I’d be happy if NASA got more funding for more scientific work. But I do not like funding going for an unnecessary mission acceleration. 

Nothing that I said was bullshit. I already stipulated to your point that contractor companies have salaries.

Except by that rationale, we could spent the entire annual budget on anything (candy, pet rocks, mattresses) and as long as we did it domestically it wouldn’t matter. It would all be feeding the economy, right? That’s not how this works. Where money is spent does matter, even if all of the options are domestic.

Except the Apollo program was near the birth of space launching and exploration and was the first time we had ever built such a vehicle. It should be cheaper the more times you do it.