I thought the pressure to change it from a Tibetan character came either explicitly or implicitly from China? As in either Chinese distributors said it wouldn’t be allowed to be released in China with a Tibetan character, or the studio knew in advance to avoid the issue since a China release has become essential for…

> On iOS: Settings → Privacy → Location Services → Uber → choose “Never”

> Yup - I misremebered but, as the Democrats like to say...”it’s the seriousness of the charge!”

> We’re done here; I’m not going to continue to entertain the idea that fake news is good.

Oops, you’re confused! Let’s try this again - they found official memos from the same base at the same time with the same superscript “th” - there were typewriters at the time that could make it. So the documents weren’t necessarily Microsoft Word forgeries despite your claim— they just couldn’t adequately prove they…

It’s on the same page and in the same typeface. lol, you tried. Trying counts, I guess?

Provide links of Mary Mapes saying they’re forgeries...

It doesn’t seem fair to paint everyone else with your willfully ignorant brush.

You’re still confused about what fake news is and how that differs from journalistic errors which are later corrected. Context matters. Nuance matters. If you’re not equipped for these things, there’s not much we can do to help you.

And those people are willfully ignorant. They’re likely not aware they found other documents in the official records from that base at that time with the superscript “th” from a typewriter, so the documents didn’t necessarily come from Microsoft Word. Or that there was more proof than the Killian documents which spoke…

third paragraph: “If you get to 39 minutes, you can see that, yes, it also plays Doom. Barely.”

The Dan Rather story was not fake. There are questions about some of the documents used to support the thesis but they were never proven to be fake, just not sufficiently validated enough to be used in the story. Part of it involved the belief that typewriters didn’t make superscript “th”’s at the time, but that was…

...Those numbers are no longer in the article because they were corrected. This is how corrections work.

Which numbers are false?

2+ million more Americans voted for Clinton than for Trump and his platform. This is a fact. Trump does not have a mandate.

Wrong. More Americans voted for Hillary Clinton than for Donald Trump. More Americans voted for Democratic Senate candidates than for Republican Senate candidates. Those are factually true statements the author is using to urge of course of action, which is an opinion. You’ve got no leg to stand on here.

Never said they had a mandate, just that Trump doesn’t - which is the thesis of the article.

You missed the lede of the article where Clinton won 2+ million more votes in the election than Trump. The correction on the House votes doesn’t negate the thesis of the article - which is Trump won the election but he doesn’t have a mandate, and that Democrats should press that point.