Who needs to know anything about anything when your product is "disruptive"?

So I guess you could say.......he was exiled from play?

But absolutly dreadful driving. Coulda killed someone by paying more attention to the camera than the road. Bad driver, bring a photographer for the back seat next time. Bad, bad, bad!

If he can’t command at least twelve an hour and he’s been in this game 25 years something’s up.

It looks like the woman that is talking to him as he exits is probably telling him he needs to go back inside, but for fear of the guy starting a physical confrontation, let him go. I don’t know.

No. No one ever claimed that. Intentionally misunderstanding a concept does not invalidate it.

No, they are mostly checking to make sure the number of items in your cart matches the number of items on the receipt.

This very writer told us that - and even links to her article about it in the article above.

This very media outlet told us Costco checks receipts to protect the member from being overcharged not to catch thieves. I chafe at having to wait inline to prove I bought my stuff but don’t want to risk my membership. Still dumb criminal. He seems to not understand video surveillance while wanting one of his own. If…

Remember, just because somebody spends 12 hours a day doing something doesnt mean they deserve to get paid a full-time salary for it.

It’s a side gig because it was never meant to be a living-wage job... If they want to make a living wage as a driver, they should find another outlet other than Uber/Lyft.

You can get away with an engine hoist to get the drivetrain out - you put the engine on a jack, drop it out, then lift the body up around it.

Oh, I subscribed to SCC as well.

I’m guessing this is sarcasm. I really hope this is sarcasm. Or we have different definitions of ethical. 

What’s the alternative, letting your money rot away in a bank account? 

The fact that it says the plaintiff suffered severe burns instead of 2nd or 3rd degree etc. sounds to me like they didn’t require medical attention.

I wondered the same thing, but I’m guessing the ruling was based on the plaintiff’s argument; it seems their argument was that the defendant was liable due to negligence, but the jury found no negligence. The plaintiff can’t win an argument they didn’t make (the one you point out).

Don’t ruin my f*cking joke!!!!!

This is real coal rolling, bitches.

more trainlopnik please