Peaches.

No

My pronouns are hat and what.  Convince me I’m wrong.

“However, in giving the Kavalry this Veidt video (which is definitive proof that President Redford and his liberal cronies know the squid was a hoax), the show has turned Rorschach’s journal into a footnote, making it oddly unclear why the Kavalry worships him as much as it does—beyond his racist tendencies, of…

I don’t think the Kavalry *does* have the Veidt video. An inner circle of the Kavalry that Senator Keene is using to manipulate the Kavalry as a whole has it. I’m pretty certain the average Kavalry member doesn’t know about it and believes all of them are following Rorschach’s inspiration.

She came back just to subject us to her bitching about how much she hates Discovery. I used to like her, but this is just — to use her word — absurd.

I read a couple of different recaps of Discovery each week, and I find that they say a lot more about the particular reviewer and what he or she expects STAR TREK to be than about the particular show.

Seriously, can someone less emotional and maybe a little more objective start reviewing Discovery? You know, someone who can actually discuss pros and cons of an episode without having a meltdown? Maybe a review like this - https://www.avclub.com/burnham-meets-the-emperor-and-discovery-finds-a-new-gro-1822278505

Apparently this is possible.