hins
hins
hins

There's a huge difference in looking and gawking. Staring with your eyes focused on one spot or with lustful eyes can make people feel uncomfortable. If you're looking, even if you check someone out or turn your head to get another look at a person can be fine as long as it's only to admire the person's beauty and

I agree 100%. I was just responding to the person who said, "men aren't making babies appear" Either way i don't know why i was trying to explain the logic behind the OP's comment. Forcing any person to go through a health procedure like this is appalling and not the kind of world I would like to live in.

The OP probably said have men get a vesectomy because it's reversible, easier and less invasive than the procedure for women. I disagree with the idea of force vesectomy completely but just saying that might have been OP's logic behind suggesting that.

This is not a big deal and that's the point! Someone made this woman's bathing suit into a big deal and treated her poorly and that shouldn't have happened. We are all saying this is not a big deal (her bathing suit that is) but someone else made it into a big deal. Someone being treated like this however is kind of a

It's about the father's choice too. His choice to ejaculate his sperm inside a woman. It's about his choice to do that and about his child. A woman doesn't have the right to control the man's body and control whether he can get her pregnant or not and just like that the man doesn't have a right to a woman's body and

That would be giving him rights over the woman's body. You're crossing a line there and no one has that right to another person's body. The man does have a choice, he can choose to ejaculate inside a woman or not. That's his choice from that point on he doesn't get to decide what happens inside a woman's body.

Yes unless it's a woman who's absolutely gorgeous and the man is just happy a woman like that is near him, words like too easy, slut, desperate, thirsty(i learned this one recently) come to mind. There was a study done by new mexico state i think that said it often leads to men having less respect for the woman.

The people that are worried about the safety aspects of Abortion are the same ones that don't want to regulate Air, Water, Food or Drugs.

I'm a very conventionally pretty girl and have a body type similar to what you see presented in the media so that's the reason for me not facing rejection. I have walked up to guys many times or been the one to initiate we hangout when i'm interested, it's just that I have never gotten turned down or i get asked

I haven't gotten rejected since I was in middle school and maybe early high school and from what i remember facing rejection was easier than having to explain why i'm not interested. Even as a young teenage girl i had the decency to take a No not interested and move on without demanding an explanation from the guy.

The reason women start using the boyfriend/husband method is because we have learned it works best. I learned this lesson in middle school when simply saying no i'm not interested meant I either had to answer a lot more questions and explain why exactly i'm not interested or get called a bitch or a tease

1. There is risk of executing an innocent person

Or companies on upward trajectories are more likely to appoint a woman as CEO?

You are risking the health and life of a fetus and potentially child by abusing drugs at the time of conception. It really is the same thing. You're knowingly pumping yourself with drugs while knowing you could conceive a child and cause deformities and health risks to that child yet deciding to have sex anyway.

It's not my fault you're misinformed. You already know, a pregnant woman abusing drugs can be harmful to the development of the fetus which can cause many health problems once it's born. If her child is harmed because she abused drugs while pregnant then by law, she can face criminal charges and you are in favor of

The part that unfairly targets women. A Father who uses drugs at the time of conception can also have negative, even life threatening effects on the child. So if we're going to charge women who use drugs and have a baby born with addicted or with a disability, shouldn't we also charge the father for his role in the

Firstly locking up these mothers is not only unhelpful but also extremely expensive. Not to mention you're locking someone up for having a sickness which is also inhumane. Helping them get treatment for their addition and putting them in rehab would be more effective. Secondly if they're being charged for anything it

How about not let your teenage boys go out alone just in case they rape someone. Even if you think your innocent child could never do that, you have to protect him from the bitches who lie and accuse "innocent boys" and "ruin their lives"

I don't understand why the poor girl who is raped gets shamed and no one says anything of the men/boys who rape them. They should be the ones being shamed(not to mention locked up in prison). It's sickening! UGHHkhdlfdksjflkdjf

Most of the artwork i've seen are women with rolls. Also now a size 23-25 inch waist on women is preferred but if we go back to early 1900s the ideal to strive for was 28-30 inch waist. Beauty standards for women's size has been shrinking