It’s a loose/loose/loose/loose scenario. Certainly one of the leading candidates from the two major parties will end up being president, and none of them are good choices for that position.

“Deciding against the clear will of the people is tantamount to tyranny and won’t be accepted.”

“Let’s be real here, one has to be in either party to succeed. The people can only choose between the nominees of the two parties.”

You are confusing the office of president (chosen by electorial representatives guided by vote of the people) with the Republican presidential nominee. A party can nominate whoever it wants however it wants. The primaries and caucuses political parties making their decision, that is not a decision “of the people.”

“if you value a system where the people can have their say, then this just feels wrong.”

“internet service from $70/mo”

“The cheapest plan in NYC is like $40 for cable speeds”