How about you pay for them instead of endorsing your fascist tyranny?

You're showing us your projection.

Keep in mind that the US experienced a MASSIVE influx of immigrants during that time and there was a lag as housing was literally slapped together in cities with large immigrant populations. It worked itself out eventually, thanks to capitalism.

good luck with that one John, the Darwin cultists around here don't like having their dogmas questioned

Damn you're paranoid! did you dismiss my responses to your latest bloviation? for some reason my comments show up everywhere else

Is there some reason this particular post is not showing up in public comments as all my other comments have on this thread?

What positive claim have I made that puts the burden of proof on me? I'm not going to defend claims I have never made. If you quote me, it makes it easier to know what the hell you're referring.

My game? How wonderful that you can ascribe motives to me based on written words on the Internet! You should get a late night infomercial and make some money.

thank you for your thoughtful polite response. I have Thanksgiving honey do tasks and will get to a full response in due time.

Reprehensible?? Requests for evidence are reprehensible? Noting the paper referenced does not support the claim in the title of this article is reprehensible?

Why? I'm not talking about faith in empiricism. I'm talking about faith something is true, absent empiricism.

So far, you've made claims about evidence, but not shown any actual evidence. Don't wear your hand out patting yourself on the back....

You fail to understand what I wrote. I'm not opposed to the idea, but the evidence such is the case simply isn't there.

Artiofab, what have I written that even remotely conforms with Gish Galloping, whatever in the hell that is?

You guys should listen to yourselves. It always amuses me to see how quickly guys like you will make assumptions about who I am, what I know, etc, etc. Most of the time I have other things in my life more important than patiently demonstrating the epistemological shallowness of materialist know it alls in forums…

And so, you employ ad hominem. Very logical, shows how confident you are in your own views. Congratulations on outing yourself.

The quote you selected from Yim assumes the transition from land to sea, without really anything demonstrating such is the case.

You have failed to explain how my dissent and use of snark (Darwin Cult) is Lamarckian. My point remains, the title of this piece is not supported by the referenced paper.

Ah, my bad. I read it too quickly...

How is that an answer to my question? (How is "Darwin Cult" Lamarckian?)