Supporting this illegal behavior is like saying if you leave your house or car unlocked it should be destroyed. If I put up an IoT camera and don’t secure it, that’s on me. Fuck you if you think you have some right to destroy my property.

Let me put it this way, Gizmodo has now published an article supporting what this guy does.

Cheering him on. Encouraging him. Stating quite clearly that GIZMODO supports this effort.

Now, while I am not an ambulance chaser, i’m willing to bet I can find one if one of my IoT devices is suddenly bricked. I can then…

There was not a single pixel in this that was not infused with complete and total win.

Maybe walk over, say hello, and ask what they do? Then you don’t have to speculate and bust on this guy.

When I worked at EA I was considerably older than nearly everyone else in the department, and certainly the oldest of my peers. In the majority of cases, I was literally old enough to be their father.

I hereby request this apparent snake-fucking footage please.

I needed this. I almost die every time I watch (accidentally) the news.

Reddit is like a (very) hot girlfriend who’s also crazy, you just have to take into account which buttons not to press while trying to get laid.

Is it possible that those downvoting and those upvoting are two completely separate groups of people? It boggles the mind!

I am so split. I am having a hard time figuring out what is the worst part about this setup. Variable dispensing amounts or putting the roll on backward.

The roll is on backwards.

If you are offended by this you are stupid.

Your little bad joke quip really doesn’t have any place in this article. You’re taking a serious tone to the entire thing then - oh hey! Jokes!

You seem pretty butthurt over his witty and original insult.

Why the need to respond to me out of the blue, when there are tons of posts calling out this oversight.

But officer! I was going the same speed as traffic!

I bet you're fun at parties.

Zing!