That’s your problem, you think I’m defending anyone. I don’t know you and you don’t know me so you have no idea what I know or don’t. Granted you may know more than me, I don’t make absolute claims like you do, but I can guarantee you don’t know more than the authorities. Yet they have not charged her with…

Read my other comments to you. Should clear up your confusion.

You don’t know what she KNEW. If the government KNEW they would have arrested her for conspiracy without a doubt. Spouses can easily hide from each other their motives or true intentions. Especially in that household where it seems he kept her out of the loop on just about everything. Should she have know?…

It maybe factually correct, the Miranda Rights statement can be suspended, but the rights that the Miranda statement mention have not been suspended. If a person voluntarily asks about his or her rights, law enforcement must let them know them, key among them the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent.

Once again, suspending Miranda Rights does not suspend the rights themselves. Miranda rights is only a statement that is required by law enforcement to be said to a person about to be interrogated. She asked about her rights. The response isn’t suppose to be “You ain’t got shit.”

Miranda rights are not the actual rights themselves. Wow that you do not know that.

Learn to law. Being exempt from telling a person their rights(i.e. Miranda) is not the same as being able to deny those rights, which is what you seem to be implying. The only difference here is, she has to know her rights on her own. She does.

You are missing a key point of that article. She isn’t DENIED the rights, they just don’t have to explain the rights. She does not lose her right to an attorney.