Good thing we have a little something called Eistenstadt v. Baird.

If you can’t understand the difference between a Democratic primary candidate dropping out for the good of the party and the principles it subscribes to when it becomes clear he cannot be the nominee and members of different parties fighting to the death in a general election, then you’re just being dumb.

The F you on about? From Hospice Austin’s website:

OMG this is amazing Bernie-tard logic. Poor little Bernie supporter UNFAIRLY excluded from the DEMOCRATIC convention for failing to be registered as a DEMOCRAT.

In the general, no “actual votes” are counted before election day in November. You are clearly pretending not to understand the difference between how that election works and how the primary works (hint: actual votes in the primary have already been counted), which is typical of Sanders supporters failure to come to…

Whose remaining delegates cannot possibly delivery the primary for Sanders...

Jezebel has turned into those mean girls from high school who were way too cool for everything and pretended not to be impressed by anyone or anything.

This headline is misleading. The Supreme Court did not block the law from taking effect, nor did it allow the law to take effect. All that it did is decline to accept the case from the lower Court of Appeals, which means that court’s decision to block the law remains in effect.