But Chrysler took control in 1987, until they sold Lamborghini in 1994.
But Chrysler took control in 1987, until they sold Lamborghini in 1994.
How so? It’s still an LT series engine, I’m sure most aftermarket parts produced for the C7 will swap directly over. Of course excluding things like manifolds.
I think more apt would be possibly Aston Martin with the Valkyrie. I doubt they’ll be making any money on the Valkyrie, but they used the Valkyrie to springboard into producing the cheaper Valhalla.
On a per unit basis? Yes.
That’s been a fact for a while now. But it’s not about always being the fastest. Sure, a DCT is faster, but there will always be someone faster then you. Sometimes it’s more rewarding to just back off and have fun rather then chance lap times.
I said it below- rich people want exclusivity above all else. In particular, the Apollo IE and Brabham BT62 are great examples of that. Multimillion dollar cars from otherwise unknown manufactures (technically the Apollo is from the same company that built the Gumpert Apollo but that’s besides the point.)
That’s why it’s brilliant, rich people want hyper-exclusivity cars. That’s why cars like the Apollo IE and Brabham BT62 now exist.
What do you mean by the results of Chrysler involvement with Lamborghini speaking for themself...?
The LT series is not nearly as easily tunable as the LS. It’s an LT2, so it’s not much different then the current engine in the C7.
Oh god is it good to see content from you again! Even tho it’s advertised content, the moment I saw your name I had to click on it. I miss your articles so much.
I fail to see how Verstappen in a douche. I think he’s awesome, and he’s my favorite driver right now. I liked him even at Toro Rosso.
Counter-Point:
It has nothing to do with sexism on the behalf of the manufactures.
I think Trump was just saber ratting. I think the plan was to have the strike force show up on Iran’s radars, then disappear.
Can we just point out the fact that the P4/5 was built 13 years ago? Yeah, the P72 looks better. But it’s also brand new.
Hardly. The P4/5 is 13 years old at this point. They took the P4/5 and modernized it, but otherwise brought nothing new to the table.
Except the P4/5 is 13 years old at this point. This car looks like a slightly modernized version of it.
Actually this is right in the ball park of the GTI. The conversion is a bit unfair and misleading. In the UK, the GTI Performance retails for 32,925 GBP, which translates to $41,000 USD.
Yeah but I’d say the Dodge model is sustainable because it still appeals to the younger generations while HD *only* appeals to Boomers.
VIN-dicated you say?