Agreed. Might still smoke on occasion though, we don't know :)

Everyone is free to make their own choices. Don't deny the daughter a choice because she's a woman, that's sexist.

I wonder if a transverse implementation could pull a 'Ferrari FF' - stick a flywheel on each side of a belt-less engine and have a CVT gearbox driving each wheel (to give you uninterrupted traction and also vary torque distribution between the wheels). I wonder how that would go in an Elise, for example.

Excellent, I'd hate to have to go inside and get my gun...

Something irks me about transverse engines...

I was going to say "Mini basketball"

Ew lol.

The car never came with traction control :(

000 down under :)

Nope.

Correct sir! Points to you! Clear reverse/blinker lights at the top of the cluster is the give away.

Check the tail light on the left hand side - more likely a VX due to the clear reverse light being at the top of the housing.

I recon it's a VX based on the one remaining tail light on the left hand side :P

Yep, that's a Commodore. Probably a VX Series II. Roads look a little damp - probably had the RWD V8 SS model. Driver got on the power too early and lost it pretty early on. Looks like there was no contact with the truck. That was a biiiiig wal hit though!

Booo-urns to you, sir.

Preface - The Veyron typically has a drag co-efficient of 0.41, but in top speed mode, reduces that to 0.36 - this is logical. Reducing drag to increase the top speed.

It was a magnificent concept :'(

Us Australians would kindly like to point out that that Camaro is on a chassis WE designed and engineered. You're welcome, mate.

By 'most advanced in the world', you mean a long stretch of straight road, right?

John Hennessey knows how to build fast cars, so while these figures may sound a bit optimistic, if somebody, it's the Texan tuner who can deliver them. Apart from the added power, the F5 will also drop the Venom's coefficient of 0.44 below 0.40 while retaining enough downforce to stay on the ground.