herpderpderp
herpderp64
herpderpderp

Permission granted.

YES!!!

Idiot.

More like the Youabian Pee-eww-ma

While I didn't say it, I was thinking it! GET OUT OF MY MIND!!

Well if Pokemon is anything to go off:

Super < Hyper < Max potion. Do we call them Maxcars?

I picked it too!

/nerdbros


This is the California T. They were driving the atmo 4.5L V8 (note central boost gauge, for more bro-tastic moments!).

The Ferrari California might be the "poor man's Ferrari," but it's still crazy expensive, and it's still got a 560 horsepower twin-turbo V8. That much power is not to be taken lightly, and you are not meant to mash the pedal like a total Bro just because you happened to round a random corner.

Best. Dad. Ever!

I like this thought process.

Not just worth it, but a worthy sacrifice. Needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

Craigslist tomorrow:

While "prophylactically" is a synonym for proactive or preventative, I'd argue that using it outside of medical context is not ideal, since both the noun & adjective forms typically refer to the prevention of disease.

Are you equally as sick of acoustic covers from girls with average, droney voices?

Are they fucking serious?

I just feel sorry for the cars, but that smug little prick clearly needs a dose of reality.

Did somebody hit the 'snooze' button?

Looks really promising for low speed implementations. High speed however (highways) - traction itself is not an issue (the surface can be modified to increase traction), but NVH and tyre wear (thus fuel economy) could suffer, and I'm also not totally convinced on high speed cornering loads, and breaking traction

I shared your concern at first, but after reading some of the FAQ's and watching the vid a few times, it seems like their traction issues might not be the biggest problem. They can increase the traction by modifying the surface of the glass. HOWEVER - I believe the trade off will sacrifice NVH and tyre wear. I'm also