The bill is about background checks. It’s aimed to increase employment among ex cons. That does nothing to change the spending on the war on drugs, and spending is the driving factor behind the war on drugs. If it doesn’t address spending, then it’s not addressing the war on drugs. It has, in no way scaled back the…

Lol! Did you even read the article you posted?

For all of 5 minutes. The rest of the time was spent on important issues, like do vaccinations cause autism and what would you make your code name if elected. Now THOSE are things we should be talking about!

Oh, really?? That’s so interesting! Please, tell me, what legislation have Sanders and Paul proposed to scale back the war on drugs? None? Oh. Sooooo.....they don’t actually support it, they just say they do. Got it!

Your knock on 2 of the 3 major candidates is “well, they’re old”.

No one is pretending that they don’t exist. We can’t pretend they don’t exist because they are old, uneducated, and loud.

1. Why did they support the war? Oh yeah! Because the Bush administration blatantly lied about the intelligence information, and even went so far as to smear the wife of an investigator that was sent to Iraq to verify claims of WMD’s after he returned with intel that there were, in fact, NO WMD’s in Iraq. Google…

Socialism is so terrifying! Sweden is, like, the scariest place on earth! Right??

Did you even watch the debate?

Not sure if this is intended, but you get a +1 for using pulled pork as a sexual euphemism. Well done (not the pork, but the....you get it).

All you need to do is make the top AND the bottom have lids.

You’re simultaneously saying that it’s not subjective, while acknowledging that there are “tons of calculations that go into it”.....that doesn’t make a lot of sense (unless you have a straight up formula you can share?)

This has become such a hillareous act of appropriation. Do these white people understand that this song is about cooking crack, fucking, and shooting people?

I’m from Oconomowoc, WI.

No. The courts have ALREADY ruled on this. This has been around since 2009. It’s not going anywhere - hence why the NFL/NHL/NBA etc. have waited until the last 2 years to form partnerships.

The courts have ruled that because you are not betting on the actual outcome of the game, you’re not exerting the influence that betting on spreads or outcomes has. Essentially, your ability to evaluate stats of individual players correlates to a skill, making it a skill based game instead of gambling.

This is not necessarily true. A more accurate title would be:

If I recall correctly (and I do), the ghosts were chasing Pacman until he eats some fruit.

A venereal disease

In other news, Mark Cuban announced he’s going to buy Snapchat so he can’t get fucked over again