Two seems eminently defensible since it’s enough to answer “Do I like this one more than that one”. 

What would you suggest if I’m allergic to shellfish?

I have to say, if it’s a game featuring the entire Mario cast, and I don’t know anything about who’s good or not, then 100% of the time I’m picking Daisy first.

As someone who hopes to never eat another shrimp in their life (allergies) I did find it weird when reading this that I already knew the U/# system.  It’s knowledge that I have not ever used or have a reason to use it, but somehow I picked it up.

The big problem for me about games that muddle the difference between “work” and “play” the pressure to “do things optimally so you can keep playing/keep the lights on” prevents me from just doing things non-optimally to just mess around to have fun, which is an important thing about “playing games.”

The whole concept of a “play-to-earn” video game is deeply upsetting to me. Like I get that modern predatory game design wants you to form a habit of coming back to whatever eternal game (not saying I like this but there are games I do this for), but when you literally make it “work” instead of “play” you’ve crossed a…

It should be obvious that “difference of opinion” is a thing that has limits. Like if I argue “we should hunt down, kill, and eat Playstation President Jim Ryan” and he thinks that sounds unconscionable, what we have is not a “difference of opinion” I am just acting like a maniac in this case.

Room temperature is at least 65 degrees?  I’m not sure my kitchen is ever that warm with the oven off in the winter.

This is the same principle by which I can pay for my groceries with gold bars. The grocery store does not take gold bars, but I can probably find someone who will go through effort to turn those gold bars into useful money and will consider their profit worth for their time getting groceries for me.

I confess if I’m going to get blitzed on something that is sneakily potent, I’d much rather do it in a sphere where “there’s fruit in this” is apparent, since fruit is at least a thing I know I should be eating.

If they’re going to do another Mass Effect game set in the milky way, I’d really prefer it be set a significant amount of time after Mass Effect 3, so much so that Shepard would have died of natural causes anyway, and people are kind of iffy about some of the specifics about them.

But what if they tried adding slurp juice?

I don’t even want to be around anymore, but I’m glad ITYSL is going to be.

I haven’t seen a Marvel thing since Infinity War.  Should I just fully rule out buying a ticket to see this?  Should Disney have given up on me as a customer?

But what if they give their apes slurp juice?

I usually tell service workers to “have a good one” since that seems pleasant and maximally ambiguous.

I drink water as a nervous habit, so some days I’m closer to 4 gallons than 1.

Twitter has always been ungovernable, run by bad people, and has failed to do anything effectively on purpose (including “make money.”)  Elon Musk is an insecure narcissist and a deeply stupid person, but Jack Dorsey was a bad person who wanted bad things and he was probably better at getting things done.

Sure, but if someone has an egg allergy you probably know this about them and aren’t baking them a cake. If allergens are a major issue (I’m allergic to shellfish) some part of vigilance lies on the person eating it, since ambiguous things like “sauce” aren’t always going to come with their ingredients list fully…

I always figured “secret ingredient” meant like you were putting mayonnaise in your cake, putting fish sauce in barbecue sauce, or coating your chicken in milk powder before you grill it for better browning.