helphelpimbeingrepressed
HelpHelpImBeingRepressed
helphelpimbeingrepressed

Why? Why shouldn’t OK ST be allowed to run the clock out?

This is Simmonsesque tinfoil-ness.

And you have yet to demonstrate that you have more information than even the Daily Mail. so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

UEFA has said there were open to the discussion a couple years ago. I’m not sure you would see it from the bigger leagues, as they already make money hand over fist domestically and in the Champions’ League. It would be for teams like Celtic who could bring in more money for everyone with stiffer competition every

This idea that they’d have to start from square one is a bunch of horseshit that is more about the English being anti-Scotland (which makes the position of Unionists completely laughable) than everything else put together. As far as not being able to afford it? Apart from Rangers, who I’m not sure how they’re able to

I’m not sure how out-sized the media attention is, as most of the team’s biggest stories are when they have a bad loss.

I’m not sure anyone at Celtic has felt important or had delusions of relevance in quite a while. Making the last 16 of the Champions League is considered a huge accomplishment by the fans, and it’s not like they’re the Cubs in that regard, doing it three times in the last 10 years.

Man, your ad hominem argument sure makes me rethink my position. I guess I will have to accept your “facts” (see how the scare quotes are doing all the heavy lifting, like when you said “hate”?) that they definitely would have won a title.

“If he had stuck with OKC, they would have eventually won a title”

How so? In that he shouted louder the very lukewarm take that Mo Williams wasn’t that good? Lebron James has topped 60 wins just three times, twice as a Cav. Those teams were doing a helluva lot of things right, whether you knew how to pronounce Zydrunas Ilgauskas or not.

Cavs with Delly on the floor in 2016: +10.8 per 100 possessions, with him off, +2.5 per 100. It looks ugly, but his 3 and D combo can fit really well in some places.

This one is easy. Are the Celtics shitty and going to pick at the top of the draft? If yes, then Simmons watches a couple college games and acts like he’s an expert. If no, then Simmons shits all over college hoops.

And they looked awful at the back and replaced him for Ireland. So, sure, the injuries piled up enough that they got desperate, and then said “fuck that” once they saw him play.

It’s telling that all you can do is resort to ad hominems. Sure, you go back to repeating the same unsourced nonsense that you’ve already said, and act like it’s dropping the mic, but it’s just the same crap being repeated.

“The way teams and players perform in non-ideal circumstances is a fairly obvious metric for evaluation.”

Actually they can. It’s just defenders in that league make 80's NBA players all look like Ben Wallace and Ron Artest.

“ It is an important aspect of the evaluation.”

No you’re not, Earvin. You don’t want a discussion as you’ve already pre-determined how you feel about this, and are throwing anything you can at the wall to try to defend it.

I’m taking out a second mortgage to put on “Clevelanders will seek out reasons to whine and bitch about anything”