So the investigation continues, but it seems like it’s only a matter of time before either of these old dummies—Trump or Rudy—have an episode where they go on Fox & Friends and just spit it out themselves.

Yeah, it’s moving so quickly they can’t get ahead of it, which I think is part of why it’s “sticking” a little better than his other shit.

Yep. Racism and disinformation keeps winning. The only way to fight this off is to weaken the Republican Party at all levels by winning small time elections. Obamacare was least popular in states that had governors that wouldn’t expand Medicaid.

Hahahaha fair to draw that image.

I dunno man, cry that it’s unfair or something.

I knew it would be Wohl as soon as I saw only the headline. It’s hilarious how bad he is at this. Plenty of people make up plenty of lies about politicians and they get traction! Even if they’re not big viral lies, I mean...what?!

Ugh, when my grandpa was dying, he was being talked into buying new cars, shit on QVC, things for a woman that we think he thought was his girlfriend, and fucking SURGERIES - yeah, like fucking doctors were selling his ass knee replacements while his liver was failing. Of course I miss him, but I don’t know if I could…

“I know we had the House, Senate and Presidency before, and all we did was actually try to take away what little healthcare you have AND your premiums have gone up since then, but vote for us again and THIS TIME we’ll fix it.”

Ideas but I have less internet arguing experience to go on with this one so I’m less sure about them (and we know internet arguing is the best way to data collect):

Not like it doesn’t matter. I’m younger and want someone who has to live on the dying planet with me to be in power. I am white, but people who aren’t care that their interests are represented and often trust non-white people to do that better. ::I don’t see color:: doesn’t work.

If only the Republicans in the Senate would act like the president breaking the law is worth doing something about!

I think it’s possible it will matter but it just depends on how it is all shaking out at that point. If frontrunners are neck-and-neck, those 1%-5% polling candidates’ numbers will make a difference. If they’re not, I think you’re right that it will not really matter.

The misogynist call is often coming from inside the house.

Yeah I voted for Bernie in 2016 as well but  I think if Warren were running back then it would’ve been a no brainer for me.

I mean, yes, but all the people on the stage trying to win the GOP nomination fit into that category too, but Trump trampled them and is now the object of a bunch of unhealthy obsessions. He ran specifically as an outsider taking down the establishment. If the establishment takes him out, I don’t think that weird…

I think that many of these questions will start getting answered as we approach Iowa (and after) and those Also Rans start dropping like flies. Who will their supporters flock to? 

Of those two choices, I’d like to see Castro over Harris - of course because I like him better, but really I think it might help electorally by: 1) helping us out in TX (even if it doesn’t “flip” it for the presidency, it might flip some more seats) and 2) might make the ticket feel more balanced if it’s not two…

Yeah at that point I’m just like, you wanted to destroy us, then you’re going to go down with the fucking ship. I don’t like it but it’s better than them being in control.

I totally agree with you. AND they need to be able to articulate it without throwing the other under the bus. It’s not that I don’t want some good healthy primary fighting, but if they are harping on little details too much we’re missing the point you ask about: “what makes YOU better?”

Sexists: Overt sexists (see the criticisms of Warren being a “school marm” type). Subconscious sexists. People who don’t consider themselves sexist but also think a woman can’t win so they won’t vote for her.