Plants died for your food, too. This is for the environment and not your moral uprightness.
Plants died for your food, too. This is for the environment and not your moral uprightness.
Censorship and small-minded people are dangerous. Books and movies aren’t.
New name, same peddling of damaging body image.
Well that Walking Dead spin off ad campaign went wrong, huh?
Teach them to read and follow instructions. 99.99999% of self-proclaimed shitty cooks do not follow the instructions. If they petulantly refuse to follow any instructions given and do what they think is best it’s best to give up and let them eat take-out. There’s no helping people like that.
Stir fry. Teach them one or two sauces and you have endless combination that you can make. For starters: Brown sauce: oyster sauce, sesame oil, cooking wine, soy sauce, sugar, starch. Peanut sauce: peanut butter, sriracha, garlic, ginger, sesame oil, lime juice, water.
Seem to be convinced, not only that if you write more words but repeat that as often as possible, that it becomes true. It does not. Your need to verbally bash the opponent with wordcount is pathological and does not mean you’re right, just annoying.
Nice derailing. You’re still championing an asshole (by pulling catastrophizing alternate facts out of your ass to make him sympathetic) who was a dick to a disabled person so what does that say about you, hon?
No your point is white-knighting for a scumbag because he maybe potentially might be poor and now homeless instead of focusing on what he did and the victim. Please choke on your pearls.
Make the pranksters pay for the full cost of the recall. done.
Nice victim blaming. Was her phone too sexy?
His poverty status has nothing to with him being a dick to that lady.
Lies. That’s half of mine!
Hulk! Smash! Puny cucumber.
You know playing the victim here is really not a good look when we can all see your words uppage. You are neither sorry, nor unaware what you did, and calling it ‘nuance’ when you tried to rhetorically steer the argument so that you could shoehorn your opinion into the opposite is not nuance. Pretending to agree and…
LOL i still think the no leftover cake solution is the best. i mean left over cake!?!?!
I don’t understand. What’s this left-over cake you speak of? The concept does not compute.
The part where you, again, try to weasel a BUT in. You don’t agree when you do that, you’re trying to pacify me and then feed me the opposite.
In what universe is going through the tupperware ambiguous? People like that get away with being that rude because people don’t like confrontation. I do not believe for one second that he didn’t know that was rude.