doesnt matter if you asked me. im free to respond to whomever. no need to descend into rudeness. and her privileged cant be argued in regards to communications between the spouses

huh? its a simple rule and the judge stated as much

suing the lawyer is dumb tho. he’s representing someone else. the dismissal will be affirmed

improper questions are those that seek to breach spousal privilege and are outside the scope of the action

do they generate more revenue than the men’s team. the article says they generated more last year

he’s a serial rapist of over 50 now? when was this decided

it’s more his because it didnt come from your mother, or from both parents, but only from his “male line”

not really. the families of criminals are many times also victims

how can he refile an amended complaint if it was dismissed?

children’s entertainment? really? thats the distinction. then why hasnt that been raied.

not representing unpopular clients undermines the constitution. anyone that takes unpopular cases should feel porud

im sure all the tactics come from his lawyers , not him. but this is a fairly standard and basic one

no. if you re under a legal obligation to speak, like a subpoena, you are ok. bit if you voluntarily speak about it, then you have breached the contract

whats the blackmail here? the agreement likely said she could only speak to her accountants and lawyers about it. her speaking to the media and even law enforcement, would violate the deal. she waived her rights to get any relief from her alleged injuries in exchange for the money

what makes you think there arent studies that have asked the question about men. however, men tend to retain the ability to have kids very late in life so it wouldnt be exactly the same

men can still have babies even if frail and old