I absolutely would! Beyond the benefits of weight training for women in helping offset or cease the ailments brought about by osteoporosis, “skinny fat” like your linked study is talking about is a silent danger.

No, I do not complain about them, because a loud, growing segment of society hasn’t suddenly stood up screaming that anorexic, nutrient-deficient size zeroes are beautiful and healthy. It’s understood that being underweight is bad, but now we’re so suddenly eager to say overweight isn’t bad. Just because it’s growing…

While it’s high, it still means over 4 out of 5 obese women are still obese, and not just “curvy” or “all the right junk in all the right places”. The error rate being high doesn’t mean “BMI is junk” is a magical elixir for overweight women.

Please justify why someone’s sexual attractions shouldn’t include the level of fitness of prospective partners.

If you’re not skinny, you’re eating too many calories. 3000 calories of salad is negligibly different than 3000 calories of ice cream. Do better.

Then I guess I’m not a real man for not being attracted to obese women? I prefer women who can count calories, not collect dress sizes.

Why is BMI dumb? While it incorrectly classifies 3% of individual men and 18% of individual women, there isn’t a better accessible tool for population-wide risk assessment.

This is absurd. She does not have an hourglass figure. She’s an obese person with good enough genetics to not look like marmalard.

She shouldn’t get hate for her body. People should get hate for calling her obese body normal. If “obese” isn’t bad, then call her obese and celebrate her obesity. Don’t say she’s “normal”.

If you don’t think she’s fat, you are out of your gourd. You ladies and gentlemen of the commentariat have some dangerously-skewed perspectives on weight.

She’s obese, yes.