If you don’t work in this area it might same. Would you really be hiring people for a site like this who would benefit from being told to keep notes of interviews?

I doubt it. Each sport has a very small group of stars who make many times as much as most pro athletes. The rank and file are not going to go to war so a handful of pitchers can get paid 10 times as much as everyone else.

I will tell you that all bets are off when your two left wheels end up in loose gravel or grass.

Where is the scam part, other than someone trying to avoid a $75 business license?

Sadly, this site was never intended to be what you describe. I think the article hits it on the head.

I never play multiplayer, not so much because of cheaters, but I just don’t want to ruin my limited gaming time with trolls and jerks.

I am not liking the “Yes/No” reviews that much. It seem that only really terrible games ever get a no, so now most everything is a yes.

It concerns me that the studio and valve think they should get 75% of the cut. That is just plain greedy and means the people who do the actual programming get very little.

Better advice, post family pictures, important life updates, etc. on FB.

I agree. How would a teacher handle this?

Are you going to call the city and see what their view is of a two way mirror in a public bathroom? It may have made yelp, but I’m betting the city of Chicago is not yet aware of this.

Pretty much every society in the world has agreed that there is certain content that should NOT be distributed to children. That typically involves sex and violence.

I think you have inserted some nostalgia into your view of the game. I love puzzle games, this is one of the worst I have ever played.

Terrible game. There were no “puzzles”. You had to try countless random actions until you stumbled upon the “correct” series of random actions. That’s not really a puzzle.

All the more reason that they had to make a business decision.

Nope, you can say it a thousand times, you simply do not understand what censorship means.

Your second paragraph actually describes censorship, the government threatening consequences for the leaking of what they considered classified information.

And I can understand that when it comes to journalism, it would be concerning if news was not being reported because of some sort of fear and you could call that self-censorship.

Then I guess every decision that companies make about how to design and market products to the parents of children is self-censorship.

Still not censorship. No one is stopping them from distributing it.