It's even worse. Your bank does it for free.

In the early 90's I had a new guy at the office ask if he could borrow two bucks. The next day he called in and quit. Turned out he borrowed a couple of bucks from everyone in the office knowing he would not be coming back.

No, I'm a leftie and I know that over is the proper way.

An early 90's Olds 88. Tons of stuff went wrong, finally the timing belt broke and caused serious engine damage. Had it rebuilt but never ran right after that.

Could it be your shop was getting them from salvage yards?

Yes, because once that happens, it's much more palatable to allow American jobs to be exported so companies can see slightly larger profit margins.

I have actually perfected turning good used cars (in decent shape and a only few years old) into cheap crappy cars.

Does anyone know why high speed chases are still a thing in CA?

Correct. In 2017 the date will be changed to 2019. in 2019 it will be moved to 2021, etc.,etc.

Unfortunately, people don't have much empathy in general. So it takes a extra nudge like that to get them to think about the real world impact of men who beat women.

My thought exactly. I don't see speed running as newsworthy to begin with, unless there is some really unusual or funny exploit they are using to finish a game quickly. Like the Far Cry 4 ending where you just stay at the table at the opening of the game for 15 minutes.

It's so sad how this interview illustrates that it's not about catching people doing something wrong and punishing them, the bigger issue is just getting it into their thick skulls that this is unethical and disturbing behavior they are engaged in.

How did they think that even with millions of users that anyone would ever jump on the rock 50 times and stumble across the Easter egg?

Yeah, I can't believe no one tried jumping on that rock 50 times! Now we have to drop some hints.

I agree with you, but the problem is educating a lot of white people white people. Too many of them assume that because they are never harassed by the police, that the police never behave badly and in turn that the only people assaulted by police must have deserved it.

I would suggest dropping that quote as a rhetorical device. It really does not line up with what you just explained.

And now because they complained they are a risk to the organization.

"What's best for you, usually isn't what's best for the company.But what's best for the company, is usually best for you."

How can they say that comments that others reported were untrue? Did they claim they were there and heard the comment and it was misrepresented, or were they just taking the position that they can't believe he would say some of these things and had not heard them so they must be false?

Project Veritas would never do anything that we believe would incite violence against police officers