Kone elevators are the devil.
Kone elevators are the devil.
@SG-17: Some of us were more surprised than others.
@Wolfsheim: Technically the devil is IN Sam Winchester. Which somehow sounds more appropriate given the.... undertones... of the show.
@SG-17: Wait. Last Airbender had a twist? I opted not to see that and instead read CJA's review (which made me happy for like, a month).
@speccy4i: Well, some religions have like, 400 devils. I think they'd need a bigger elevator.
@Chris Braak: What? Could you never quite get the hang of Thursdays?
I for one welcome....
@1Opinion: The shot is long and purposeful. It is an intentional recreation of the identical comic panel, using visuals to tell us that Hollis is outdated.
@1Opinion: The problem is that the sign is not outdated in the movie, it's competently out of place. Every car on the street is a gas car, so him having a sign that say he specializes in what the sign proclaims is an outdated technology makes no sense, because they technology is not outdated. The technology was…
@xdeathknightx: Wait! Are you joking?
@1Opinion: I would say the book was about two thing. First it was about creating an almost codifying text on the comic book industry, through a narrative. The second part was to tell a story about what world politics might actually be like in a world with real superheros, and what those people would have to be like…
@ctuley: Great minds think alike.
Camelot? I mean sure, it's the best they had of those last two seasons, but come on, it doesn't hold a candle to Nemesis or Lost City: Part 2 with Jack in status.
@Smeagol92055: Oh a lot of stuff is right out of the book on how to make a cheesy squeal. Having the ship break down over and over, introducing an even more scoundrelly scoundrel. Taking a droid and strapping it to the back of a Wookie (ok, maybe that one isn't in the handbook). My percentage may be off, but a…
Empire, one half cheesy sequel, one half epic masterpiece. I do love that film.
@Bookdust: They do have two different aims. PatF was trying to recapture the classic animation magic while this is trying to prove that Disney can compete with 'Dreamworks' style animation outside of Pixar.
@01SNKOWNR: I think the name is supposed to be an allusion to the fact that there is not one hero in this story, but two who are 'tangled' together.
@Bookdust: I'm perfectly capable of loving Princess and the Frog, and looking forward to this. I have much love when it comes to modern (ok, all) Disney animation.
@sans_fi: You're half right. This is obviously an attempt by Disney to do two thing - make a strong male character with depth in a 'princess' movie (something they've always struggled with) and create a film about two people on an adventure together, not one person being dragged along behind the 'hero.' Hence -…
I can't help it. I love Disney. This is a must see for me.