My Japanese friends don't support Japanese team. It has nothing to do with where you are from. XD
My Japanese friends don't support Japanese team. It has nothing to do with where you are from. XD
You can be handsome while still authentic.
I'm simply saying I don't feel this is a proper character design. A good character design needs to be creative and appealing. But this one, at least for me, is not appealing at all.
For a moment, I thought that was some generic enemy soldier. How can people call this character design when you can simply pull a random guy looks like this on the street?
I'm always all for single player games. I play games at my leisure time just want to relaxing. I want to play games at ease and at my own pace. If I ever play multiple player games, I only play with people I know or best, side by side. I don't feel comfortable to play games with random strangers online because most of…
I guess it's only in US. In Japan, voice actors usually become celebrities and span over other form of entertainment.
Another first person shooter. 'nuff said.
To be honest, Rockstar Pass is the first time I buy DLCs for games because I usually despise it. I thought it's a good value for 4 additional chapters. But now they are doing this again saying game is incomplete. I'm starting to doubt my opinion.
No it's not stupid because those UN-immersive feelings come true and strong for some people. And those things do matter to some people like me. I never felt my character was walking, it's more like floating in the sense of movement control. And also the narrow view angle is totally not realistic compared to real…
If you don't like other people's comment, don't comment back. Your logic is invalid.
I don't find first person views THAT immersive though, especially when your character move like a walking turret and you have to turn your whole body to look the other way. Also you can't see your own feet and when you see your character's shadow. usually you see robotic animation. I somehow find usually 3rd person is…
I was being sarcastic implying the lazy(at least in my opinion) character design. Of course I know they are different.
Yeah but all those still depend on individual games. If someone is only into certain type of games, they are fan of that genre, especially in the time that many PC games are pretty consolized.
$5 for another color swap ninja. Way to nickle'n'dime. Good job.
I'd be more interested if it's a 3rd person game. I hate not being able to see what your character looks like.
If not for the name of Resident Evil, this would just be another generic zombie/shooter game. The whole constant nonstop shooting fest looks really boring.
I don't really understand how people can take camp or stance when it comes to video gaming. For me I'd never call myself a PC gamer or console gamer. I simply play the games, if there are games both on PC and console, I play PC version due to higher graphic quality and better control(in case of first person games); if…
It's obvious you are not a RPG person per se,
I don't know, but the regenerating health is really starting to turn me off from shooters. Seeing how he just ran through the enemy camp being shot constantly while still moved and acted like nothing happened simply takes away the tension and realism.
The thing is when you look at shooters, you get plenty to choose from. But when you look at other games, probably the worth playing ones are just one, two or three in each genre. And the release of games of other genres are far less than shooters.