...Which means you took that obviously tongue-in-cheek title literally, which again references my first comment, which is that you have no sense of humor.

Up for adoption: One completely fucking deaf cat

News Flash: Your Mother-In-Law Not Every Mother On Planet

Sorry, but you don't have a sense of humor.

China will soon learn that you need a LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT more than an aircraft carrier to have an aircraft carrier. What gets publicized a lot less is that we have, by orders of magnitude, the world's biggest and most in-depth sea-based logistical system. It takes entire fleets of support ships to support a carrier,…

Wishful thinking, visualized.

As a current Sailor, I officially vouch for this article. There's little like the open sea.

Except for that small detail where semaphore hasn't been used in the Navy since the late 90s and early aughts (along with Morse code), and the Signalman rating was folded into the Quartermaster rating. Progress!

If I release the clutch slowly enough in my '12 Mustang GT, it will move in first without having to press the gas. Theoretically, any manual should be able to do this; I don't think my car is that special.

VOTE: LEATHERMAN WAVE

Hunt: Successful, then really, really unsuccessful.

Not shown: Three Russian dudes getting the ever-living fuck beaten out of them by two dozen other very pissed off Russians.

Well... that's uh... one way to do it.

What the fuck is up with people cursing the "weak output" of the diesel engine? Have people forgotten that diesel engines always have a low HP rating? Convert 250HP to torque at 1500rpm, see what you get. (it's 875lb/ft)

Am I the only one that thinks that red-lining an engine three seconds after starting it probably ain't real great for it?

The irony is that Apple has spent the next 40 years turning themselves into a company whose user base would neither comprehend, nor care about any of the features used to sell the original. Progress!

Yeah uh, the 5.0L engine in the Mustang puts out 420hp and 400lb/ft of torque. That's 1.2L less than the 'Vette engine. Would you be impressed by a 1.2L engine producing 35hp and 60lb/ft of torque? I would not. I am not.

This seems to me to be absolutely nothing an E-2C with ESM and two EA-18Gs can't handle easily.

You spent ten minutes crafting a genius retort to my quick 30-second joke, and you're calling me the idiot?