Any of the top 100 men would more than likely beat her, Fed included. Obviously nothing in sport is 100% but we are talking 90s + at least.

Nothing is 0% in sport but she’d have less than 5%.

No, but the difference between the greatest male tennis player of all time and some bum ranked 202 in the world (who destroyed her after a round of golf and a few beers) is as large or even larger.

come on they were 10, you aren’t seriously going to use that as any kind of evidence are you?

You keep bringing up matches they played as teenagers. They have zero relevance to a 34 year old Serena. Her instincts and strategizing are infinitely better since then and you would know that if you gave a shit about women’s tennis as much as you do about men’s.

I love Serena, greatest athlete of the last 20 years but she wouldn’t even win a set against him. She’d struggle to win a game thinking about it, her main advantage is irrelevant against him and he moves way better even with his injury + he would kill her on 2nd serves