“he’s the dude who once compared PED users to murderers”

If you know what the term is, as you claim, then explaining it to you is a fool’s errand. If you don’t know, then this entire exchange is argumentium ad absurdium on your part. A classic paradox, yet expected from someone of your caliber.

Perhaps you’re confusing them for English words? It would certainly explain why you’re so unfamiliar with the spellings and definitions of such.

For someone so certain of the definition of the term, you continue to appeal to my help? Suspicious, yet quite telling.

I do the Misfits one because the skull goes over your junk. Hope you guys are having a good Thursday

Argumentium ad lapidem. The entire post is an ad hominem, proving your ignorance of the concept.

You’ve yet to notice that each time you demand I teach you something, you commit another ad hominem. The irony would be delicious if it weren’t so sad....

“The man who fashions himself an expert on something he fails to understand reveals himself the fool” - have fun out there

You’re unable to recognize them, yet you fashion yourself such an expert? QED.

Appeal to authority.

Ironic... in a post accusing me of misusing ad hominem, you commit several ad hominems yourself. I suppose that went over your head as usual?

“Obviously I know what it means, I just want to see if YOU know” 

Nonexistent.

I agree.

So you concede your argument is fallacious? QED.

I’m not your professor. Just a baseball fan.

Appeal to wealth. How much more money does one win for losing the title rather than winning it? None.

Still ad hominem, as well as argument ad populum. A pitiful display as usual.

Appeal to authority. Once again you’ve proven my point.

What, then, are the teams playing for? Each season has a single goal. I would assume most baseball fans know this but I’m no longer surprised by anything anymore.