haveacarortwoorthree2
haveacarortwoorthree2
haveacarortwoorthree2

Honey, I Shrunk the Verstappen.

The New Mexico Bowl was on October 1? I missed it, dammit!

Driving in a straight line does not demonstrate that they handle well. And I have driven a Demon, a Hellcat, and one the SRT widebodies (all owned by my boss) - they do not handle well. 

Loud. Very loud.

A 72 Vega handles better than the Challenger platform

All of them

And what’s even worse is I didn’t even like those when the 15s came out. Now, I long for the good “old” days.

Actually, there are many, many people who have had federal district court clerkships that were not anywhere near the top 10% of the class. Federal appellate clerkships generally are more prestigious and require better credentials. Of course, to get a Supreme Court clerkship you have to be darn near #1 in your class

Just moved to the Tampa area and am so looking forward to the next Grand Prix! 

Check your email for my invoice. :)

The vehicle owner was not the plaintiff - her claims likely were all resolved, either with or without her having a lawyer. Her passenger was the one suing and I suspect it went to trial for the same reasons that most PI cases that end up in trial are there - the defendant’s insurer thought the injury claims were bs or

Recognize that the plaintiff was not the vehicle owner - I suspect the shop did cover all of her costs to repair the vehicle, etc. The plaintiff was the passenger, who claimed he was injured as a result. I suspect the shop’s insurance company tried this because (a) they didn’t think the passenger was as injured as he

Lawyer and client likely have a contingency deal in place where the lawyer gets anywhere from 33-40% of the PI verdict.

The plaintiff was NOT the car owner but her passenger. It is extremely likely that the shop paid for all repairs to the car and covered any damages the car owner had. The shop challenged the passenger’s claim that he had the good old “lower back” and legs injuries. I suspect that the shop thought the passenger was not

Skipped over the obvious jokes and went with this one. Well done! 

Well, I have a law degree and 25 years of litigation experience. And while I can argue both sides of this case, at the end of the day I think the decision is correct. The injured party still has a negligence claim under common law against the repair shop, there just is not a statutory claim. Negligence claims clearly

What was he poking?

Unless there is a kid, pet, or unconscious adult trapped inside a car, keep your hands to yourself.

Certainly there are a number of boxers for which your statement — “Boxing has always been a sport built on allowing the impoverished an avenue to what they perceive to be wealth and notoriety” — could be true. But Patrick Day was not one of them. That also does not explain why formerly impoverished fighters continue

Copied this to cut and paste for about 20 other teams. E.g.,